CREG: Compass Relational Evidence Graph for Characterizing Directional Structure in VLM Spatial-Reasoning Attribution
On the map: LLM reasoning → Spatial and embodied reasoning
Abstract (arXiv)
Standard attribution heatmaps show where a vision-language model (VLM) focuses, but they do not reveal whether the recovered evidence is organized by the queried spatial relation or merely reflects image layout. To address this problem, we introduce CREG (Compass Relational Evidence Graph), a training-free diagnostic framework that converts token-level attribution into a reference-centered compass distribution and measures its directional alignment. CREG provides a shared directional readout across attribution methods and makes comparison with geometric controls explicit. Across three spatial-relation benchmarks, box-only geometry achieves Direction Alignment Error 28.4 to 34.4 degrees lower than the best current model-based attribution method on each dataset, leaving a substantial gap between attribution structure and simple target localization. To examine this gap, we apply a diagnostic battery including target intervention, reference-center randomization, and variance partition. Taken together, the results suggest that the directional structure recoverable from current attribution methods is limited and often mixed with image layout. We further find that higher task accuracy does not reliably coincide with better directional attribution: small-scale LoRA training and newer model generations can improve task accuracy while leaving Direction Alignment Error unchanged or worse. These findings characterize what current attribution methods reveal rather than the model's internal spatial representation. CREG provides a controlled protocol for testing whether improvements in spatial reasoning are accompanied by more directionally organized evidence.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Spatial and embodied reasoning, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 0 of its 20 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 Mar 2026.
Builds on
0 of 20 references.
No references here yet.
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025SpinBench: Perspective and Rotation as a Lens on Spatial Reasoning in VLMs
- 2025Mind the Gap: Benchmarking Spatial Reasoning in Vision-Language Models
- 2026From Hallucination to Grounding: Diagnosing Visual Spatial Intelligence via CRISP
- 2025InternSpatial: A Comprehensive Dataset for Spatial Reasoning in Vision-Language Models
- 2026Why Far Looks Up: Probing Spatial Representation in Vision-Language Models
- 2024Do Multimodal Language Models Really Understand Direction? A Benchmark for Compass Direction Reasoning
- 2026Thinking in Structures: Evaluating Spatial Intelligence in Constraint-Governed Spaces
- 2026Seek-and-View Reasoning for Multi-View Spatial Understanding