Interpreting Reinforcement Learning Model Behavior via Koopman with Control
On the map: Deep reinforcement learning methods → RL theory and sample complexity
Abstract (arXiv)
Reinforcement learning (RL) models have shown the capability of learning complex behaviors, but quantitatively assessing those behaviors - which is critical for safety assurance and the discovery of novel strategies - is challenging. By viewing RL models as control systems, we hypothesize that data-driven approximations of their associated Koopman operators may provide dynamical information about their behavior, thus enabling greater interpretability. To test this, we apply the Koopman with control framework to RL models trained on several standard benchmark environments and demonstrate that properties of the fit linear control models, such as stability and controllability, evolve during training in a task dependent manner. Comparing these metrics across different training epochs or across differently optimized RL models enables an understanding of how they differ. In addition, we find cases where - even when the reward achieved by the RL model is static - the stability and controllability is nonetheless evolving, predicting increased reward with further training. This suggests that these metrics may be able to serve as hidden progress measures, a core idea in mechanistic interpretability. Taken together, our results illustrate that the Koopman with control framework provides a comprehensive way in which to analyze and interpret the behavior of RL models, particularly across training.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in RL theory and sample complexity, one of 15 directions in Deep reinforcement learning methods. Builds on 14 of its 35 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 Mar 2026.
Builds on
14 of 35 references.
References · 14
- 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 15,215
- 2016Asynchronous Methods for Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 2,258
- 2023Progress measures for grokking via mechanistic interpretabilitycited by 839
- 2022Hidden Progress in Deep Learning: SGD Learns Parities Near the Computational Limitcited by 187
- 2016Linear predictors for nonlinear dynamical systems: Koopman operator meets model predictive controlcited by 140
- 2021Acquisition of Chess Knowledge in AlphaZerocited by 123
- 2016Generalizing Koopman Theory to allow for inputs and controlcited by 53
- 2021Rigorous data-driven computation of spectral properties of Koopman operators for dynamical systemscited by 45
- 2023Beyond Geometry: Comparing the Temporal Structure of Computation in Neural Circuits with Dynamical Similarity Analysiscited by 23
- 2024PyDMD: A Python package for robust dynamic mode decompositioncited by 14
- 2023Identifying Equivalent Training Dynamicscited by 9
- 2022Algorithmic (Semi-)Conjugacy via Koopman Operator Theorycited by 8
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025Leveraging Reinforcement Learning and Koopman Theory for Enhanced Model Predictive Control Performance
- 2021Koopman Q-learning: Offline Reinforcement Learning via Symmetries of Dynamics
- 2024Model Predictive Control of Nonlinear Dynamics Using Online Adaptive Koopman Operators ↗
- 2025KIPPO: Koopman-Inspired Proximal Policy Optimization
- 2026Efficient Reinforcement Learning using Linear Koopman Dynamics for Nonlinear Robotic Systems
- 2024Koopman-Assisted Reinforcement Learning
- 2025Balancing Interpretability and Performance in Reinforcement Learning: An Adaptive Spectral Based Linear Approach
- 2026Beyond Isolation: Unlocking Reinforcement Learning Component Synergy for Sample-Efficient Continuous Control