mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Attention Sinks Induce Gradient Sinks: Massive Activations as Gradient Regulators in Transformers

arXiv 2603.17771 ↗First posted 18 Mar 2026cs.LG cs.AIcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Attention sinks and massive activations are recurring and closely related phenomena in Transformer models. Existing explanations have largely focused on the forward pass, yet in pre-norm Transformers, large residual-stream norms play only an indirect forward role because sublayers operate on normalized inputs. We study this relationship from the perspective of backpropagation. Empirically and theoretically, we show that under causal masking, attention sinks can induce pronounced gradient concentration, which we term gradient sinks. Since the RMSNorm Jacobian attenuates gradients roughly in inverse proportion to input norm, massive activations can be understood as adaptive regulators of this localized gradient pressure during training. This interpretation predicts that attenuating sink-induced gradients should weaken massive activations. We test this prediction with V-scale, a modification that adjusts backpropagated gradients on the value path. In V-scale models, attention sinks are preserved, whereas massive activations are suppressed. These results identify gradient sinks as a backward-pass counterpart of attention sinks, and massive activations as an adaptive RMSNorm-mediated response that attenuates the resulting localized training pressure. Our code is available at https://anonymous.4open.science/r/GradientSinkCode-B309.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 43 of its 48 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 18 Mar 2026.

Builds on

43 of 48 references.

References · 43

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
  2. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  3. 2019Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformercited by 14,491
  4. 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,192
  5. 2023Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Modelscited by 12,865
  6. 2025Qwen3 Technical Reportcited by 8,195
  7. 2016Layer Normalizationcited by 5,579
  8. 2024Qwen2.5 Technical Reportcited by 4,713
  9. 2021RoFormer: Enhanced Transformer with Rotary Position Embeddingcited by 4,581
  10. 2023QLoRA: Efficient Finetuning of Quantized LLMscited by 3,355
  11. 2023Efficient Streaming Language Models with Attention Sinkscited by 2,115
  12. 2020GLU Variants Improve Transformercited by 1,724
31 more
  1. 2019Root Mean Square Layer Normalizationcited by 1,425
  2. 2022SmoothQuant: Accurate and Efficient Post-Training Quantization for Large Language Modelscited by 1,338
  3. 2023GQA: Training Generalized Multi-Query Transformer Models from Multi-Head Checkpointscited by 1,311
  4. 2023AWQ: Activation-aware Weight Quantization for LLM Compression and Accelerationcited by 1,234
  5. 2024ChatGLM: A Family of Large Language Models from GLM-130B to GLM-4 All Toolscited by 1,096
  6. 2020On Layer Normalization in the Transformer Architecturecited by 906
  7. 2023YaRN: Efficient Context Window Extension of Large Language Modelscited by 584
  8. 2017Stochastic Gradient Descent as Approximate Bayesian Inferencecited by 298
  9. 2024Massive Activations in Large Language Modelscited by 277
  10. 2018An Empirical Model of Large-Batch Trainingcited by 268
  11. 2025Gated Attention for Large Language Models: Non-linearity, Sparsity, and Attention-Sink-Freecited by 266
  12. 2020Understanding the Difficulty of Training Transformerscited by 210
  13. 2024When Attention Sink Emerges in Language Models: An Empirical Viewcited by 200
  14. 2022DeepNet: Scaling Transformers to 1,000 Layerscited by 176
  15. 2019Transformers without Tears: Improving the Normalization of Self-Attentioncited by 153
  16. 2023Quantizable Transformers: Removing Outliers by Helping Attention Heads Do Nothingcited by 147
  17. 2025Why do LLMs attend to the first token?cited by 122
  18. 2024Active-Dormant Attention Heads: Mechanistically Demystifying Extreme-Token Phenomena in LLMscited by 54
  19. 2025Attention Sinks and Compression Valleys in LLMs are Two Sides of the Same Coincited by 47
  20. 2025Systematic Outliers in Large Language Modelscited by 32
  21. 2026The Spike, the Sparse and the Sink: Anatomy of Massive Activations and Attention Sinkscited by 23
  22. 2026A Unified View of Attention and Residual Sinks: Outlier-Driven Rescaling is Essential for Transformer Trainingcited by 21
  23. 2025Softpick: No Attention Sink, No Massive Activations with Rectified Softmaxcited by 20
  24. 2025KVSink: Understanding and Enhancing the Preservation of Attention Sinks in KV Cache Quantization for LLMscited by 18
  25. 2025Unveiling Super Experts in Mixture-of-Experts Large Language Modelscited by 15
  26. 2025A Refined Analysis of Massive Activations in LLMscited by 12
  27. 2025Hidden Dynamics of Massive Activations in Transformer Trainingcited by 10
  28. 2025All You Need is One: Capsule Prompt Tuning with a Single Vectorcited by 8
  29. 2025Value-State Gated Attention for Mitigating Extreme-Token Phenomena in Transformerscited by 7
  30. 2026Attention Sink Forges Native MoE in Attention Layers: Sink-Aware Training to Address Head Collapsecited by 4
  31. 2026Surgery: Mitigating Harmful Fine-Tuning for Large Language Models via Attention Sinkcited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.

2 papers.