mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

The Life Cycle of a Massive Activation: Stochastic Birth, Weight-Decay-Driven Growth, and Competitive Consolidation

arXiv 2610.00423 ↗First posted 30 Sep 2026cs.LG cs.AIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Massive activations, residual-stream coordinates with magnitudes far larger than typical activations, are associated with attention sinks in transformers, but how their scale is regulated during training remains incompletely understood. Combining training-trajectory analyses and controlled interventions, we trace their emergence, growth, and consolidation. Sink-carrying channels vary across random seeds but stabilize early within each run. Over longer training, surrounding channels erode and the sink concentrates onto a few redundant carriers. Across ablations, gradient attenuation follows the sink token's collective root-mean-square magnitude rather than any single channel, making collective scale central to understanding their effects. Our central result is that weight decay causally controls the turnover of global activation scale. In controlled continuations, removing decay near the peak allows this scale to keep rising, whereas retaining it produces decline even at constant learning rate. We develop a balance model for the rise and peak of massive-activation magnitude, in which AdamW-preconditioned growth opposes weight decay. Sweeping the decay coefficient λ shifts peak timing approximately log-linearly and yields peak magnitudes scaling approximately as λ-1/2, consistent with this balance. Optimizer measurements further show that preconditioning sustains the large-channel cohort against decay even when raw maintaining forces are too small to do so. Together, these findings connect the observed life cycle to scale-regulating training dynamics and establish weight decay as a training-time lever on activation magnitude.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 24 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 Sep 2026.

Builds on

19 of 24 references.

References · 19

  1. 2016Layer Normalizationcited by 5,669
  2. 2023Efficient Streaming Language Models with Attention Sinkscited by 2,186
  3. 2023Pythia: A Suite for Analyzing Large Language Models Across Training and Scalingcited by 1,786
  4. 2019Root Mean Square Layer Normalizationcited by 1,480
  5. 2022LLM.int8(): 8-bit Matrix Multiplication for Transformers at Scalecited by 906
  6. 2023Vision Transformers Need Registerscited by 871
  7. 2024Dolma: an Open Corpus of Three Trillion Tokens for Language Model Pretraining Researchcited by 483
  8. 2024Massive Activations in Large Language Modelscited by 294
  9. 2024When Attention Sink Emerges in Language Models: An Empirical Viewcited by 208
  10. 2023Quantizable Transformers: Removing Outliers by Helping Attention Heads Do Nothingcited by 151
  11. 2025Why do LLMs attend to the first token?cited by 127
  12. 2021BERT Busters: Outlier Dimensions that Disrupt Transformerscited by 112
7 more
  1. 2023Rotational Equilibrium: How Weight Decay Balances Learning Across Neural Networkscited by 53
  2. 2024The Super Weight in Large Language Modelscited by 52
  3. 2023Intriguing Properties of Quantization at Scalecited by 49
  4. 2025Outlier-Safe Pre-Training for Robust 4-Bit Quantization of Large Language Modelscited by 13
  5. 2025Hidden Dynamics of Massive Activations in Transformer Trainingcited by 10
  6. 2026Attention Sinks Induce Gradient Sinks: Massive Activations as Gradient Regulators in Transformerscited by 3
  7. 2026Massive Activations Are Architecturally Robust: A Controlled Scratch/Commitment Residual Stream Testcited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.