InterPol: De-anonymizing LM Arena via Interpolated Preference Learning
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Strict anonymity of model responses is a key for the reliability of voting-based leaderboards, such as LM Arena. While prior studies have attempted to compromise this assumption using simple statistical features like TF-IDF or bag-ofwords, these methods often lack the discriminative power to distinguish between stylistically similar or within-family models. To overcome these limitations and expose the severity of vulnerability, we introduce INTERPOL, a model-driven identification framework that learns to distinguish target models from others using interpolated preference data. Specifically, INTERPOL captures deep stylistic patterns that superficial statistical features miss by synthesizing hard negative samples through model interpolation and employing an adaptive curriculum learning strategy. Extensive experiments demonstrate that INTERPOL significantly outperforms existing baselines in identification accuracy. Furthermore, we quantify the real-world threat of our findings through ranking manipulation simulations on Arena battle data.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 23 of its 43 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 Mar 2026.
Builds on
23 of 43 references.
References · 23
- 2023Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arenacited by 8,626
- 2021Evaluating Large Language Models Trained on Codecited by 8,320
- 2020Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understandingcited by 7,963
- 2018GLUE: A Multi-Task Benchmark and Analysis Platform for Natural Language Understandingcited by 4,899
- 2020Learning to summarize from human feedbackcited by 2,588
- 2024Gemma 2: Improving Open Language Models at a Practical Sizecited by 1,998
- 2022Model soups: averaging weights of multiple fine-tuned models improves accuracy without increasing inference timecited by 1,396
- 2024Chatbot Arena: An Open Platform for Evaluating LLMs by Human Preferencecited by 1,184
- 2022Editing Models with Task Arithmeticcited by 1,120
- 2023LIMA: Less Is More for Alignmentcited by 1,100
- 2024Length-Controlled AlpacaEval: A Simple Way to Debias Automatic Evaluatorscited by 897
- 2023A Watermark for Large Language Modelscited by 725
11 more
- 2024LLM Evaluators Recognize and Favor Their Own Generationscited by 686
- 2022Data Contamination: From Memorization to Exploitationcited by 236
- 2021TURINGBENCH: A Benchmark Environment for Turing Test in the Age of Neural Text Generationcited by 120
- 2024Instructional Fingerprinting of Large Language Modelscited by 68
- 2025The Leaderboard Illusioncited by 66
- 2023Elo Uncovered: Robustness and Best Practices in Language Model Evaluationcited by 61
- 2023From Text to Source: Results in Detecting Large Language Model-Generated Contentcited by 26
- 2025Exploring and Mitigating Adversarial Manipulation of Voting-Based Leaderboardscited by 20
- 2025Improving Your Model Ranking on Chatbot Arena by Vote Riggingcited by 17
- 2020Reverse Engineering Configurations of Neural Text Generation Modelscited by 15
- 2024Challenges in Trustworthy Human Evaluation of Chatbotscited by 14
Built on by
Not cited yet.