Aumann-SHAP: The Geometry of Counterfactual Interaction Explanations in Machine Learning
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We introduce Aumann-SHAP, an interaction-aware framework that decomposes counterfactual transitions by restricting the model to a local hypercube connecting baseline and counterfactual features. Each hypercube is discretized into a grid to construct an induced micro-player cooperative game in which elementary grid-step moves become players. Shapley and LES values on this TU-micro-game yield geometry-aware within-pot attributions that converge to the diagonal Aumann--Shapley / Integrated Gradients limit under grid refinement, and recover equal-split Shapley as the degenerate m=1 special case. An exact grid-state closed form gives polynomial-time computation for fixed interaction order. On a synthetic benchmark with known ground truth, equal-split Shapley carries an irreducible bias while Aumann-SHAP converges to the correct decomposition. On German Credit, interaction geometry changes feature priority rankings in 12.3% of instances. On UCI Heart Disease, equal-split misattributes a cholesterol suppressor as a positive contributor, which is a sign error Aumann-SHAP corrects. On MNIST, game-theoretic attribution reaches target confidence with 3.5× fewer edits than magnitude-based ordering, with micro-game Shapley achieving the best efficiency across all budgets.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 13 Oct 2026). Builds on 16 of its 37 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 Mar 2026.
Builds on
16 of 37 references.
References · 16
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,950
- 2016Grad-CAM: Visual Explanations from Deep Networks via Gradient-based Localizationcited by 6,713
- 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,515
- 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,055
- 2017Axiomatic Attribution for Deep Networkscited by 3,368
- 2017SmoothGrad: removing noise by adding noisecited by 1,103
- 2017Counterfactual Explanations without Opening the Black Box: Automated Decisions and the GDPRcited by 1,088
- 2019Explaining Machine Learning Classifiers through Diverse Counterfactual Explanationscited by 614
- 2019The many Shapley values for model explanationcited by 343
- 2018Actionable Recourse in Linear Classificationcited by 328
- 2020Algorithmic Recourse: from Counterfactual Explanations to Interventionscited by 250
- 2016Visualizing the Effects of Predictor Variables in Black Box Supervised Learning Modelscited by 212
4 more
- 2020Counterfactual Explanations and Algorithmic Recourses for Machine Learning: A Reviewcited by 174
- 2019The Shapley Taylor Interaction Indexcited by 143
- 2019Asymmetric Shapley values: incorporating causal knowledge into model-agnostic explainabilitycited by 114
- 2020Causal Shapley Values: Exploiting Causal Knowledge to Explain Individual Predictions of Complex Modelscited by 107
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.