SCOPE: Semantic Coreset with Orthogonal Projection Embeddings for Federated learning
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Scientific discovery increasingly requires learning on federated datasets, fed by streams from high-resolution instruments, that have extreme class imbalance. Current ML approaches either require impractical data aggregation or fail due to class imbalance. Existing coreset selection methods rely on local heuristics, making them unaware of the global data landscape and prone to sub-optimal and non-representative pruning. To overcome these challenges, we introduce SCOPE (Semantic Coreset using Orthogonal Projection Embeddings for Federated learning), a coreset framework for federated data that filters anomalies and adaptively prunes redundant data to mitigate long-tail skew. By analyzing the latent space distribution, we score each data point using a representation score that measures the reliability of core class features, a diversity score that quantifies the novelty of orthogonal residuals, and a boundary proximity score that indicates similarity to competing classes. Unlike prior methods, SCOPE shares only scalar metrics with a federated server to construct a global consensus, ensuring communication efficiency. Guided by the global consensus, SCOPE dynamically filters local noise and discards redundant samples to counteract global feature skews. Extensive experiments demonstrate that SCOPE yields competitive global accuracy and robust convergence, all while achieving exceptional efficiency with a 128x to 512x reduction in uplink bandwidth, a 7.72x wall-clock acceleration and reduced FLOP and VRAM footprints for local coreset selection.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 22 of its 33 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 Mar 2026.
Builds on
22 of 33 references.
References · 22
- 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,456
- 2016Communication-Efficient Learning of Deep Networks from Decentralized Datacited by 7,592
- 2018An Empirical Study of Example Forgetting during Deep Neural Network Learningcited by 669
- 2023DataComp: In search of the next generation of multimodal datasetscited by 635
- 2021Deep Learning on a Data Diet: Finding Important Examples Early in Trainingcited by 529
- 2017Deep Gradient Compression: Reducing the Communication Bandwidth for Distributed Trainingcited by 471
- 2019Asynchronous Federated Optimizationcited by 264
- 2018Communication-Efficient On-Device Machine Learning: Federated Distillation and Augmentation under Non-IID Private Datacited by 242
- 2019Model Pruning Enables Efficient Federated Learning on Edge Devicescited by 219
- 2022Delving into Out-of-Distribution Detection with Vision-Language Representationscited by 215
- 2019Qsparse-local-SGD: Distributed SGD with Quantization, Sparsification, and Local Computationscited by 179
- 2023InfoBatch: Lossless Training Speed Up by Unbiased Dynamic Data Pruningcited by 90
10 more
- 2023Large-scale Dataset Pruning with Dynamic Uncertaintycited by 63
- 2017AdaComp : Adaptive Residual Gradient Compression for Data-Parallel Distributed Trainingcited by 33
- 2021Learned Gradient Compression for Distributed Deep Learningcited by 20
- 2022AsyncFedED: Asynchronous Federated Learning with Euclidean Distance based Adaptive Weight Aggregationcited by 19
- 2022Calibrating Deep Neural Networks using Explicit Regularisation and Dynamic Data Pruningcited by 18
- 2024Privacy Preserving Federated Learning in Medical Imaging with Uncertainty Estimationcited by 9
- 2024Gradient Coreset for Federated Learningcited by 6
- 2024FedStaleWeight: Buffered Asynchronous Federated Learning with Fair Aggregation via Staleness Reweightingcited by 5
- 2025An Empirical Study of Federated Prompt Learning for Vision Language Modelcited by 3
- 2024FedCore: Straggler-Free Federated Learning with Distributed Coresetscited by 2
Built on by
Not cited yet.