Attention Gathers, MLPs Compose: A Causal Analysis of an Action-Outcome Circuit in VideoViT
On the map: Mechanistic interpretability → Circuits and mechanistic analysis
Abstract (arXiv)
The paper explores how video models trained for classification tasks represent nuanced, hidden semantic information that may not affect the final outcome, a key challenge for Trustworthy AI models. Through Explainable and Interpretable AI methods, specifically mechanistic interpretability techniques, the internal circuit responsible for representing the action's outcome is reverse-engineered in a pre-trained video vision transformer, revealing that the "Success vs Failure" signal is computed through a distinct amplification cascade. While there are low-level differences observed from layer 0, the abstract and semantic representation of the outcome is progressively amplified from layers 5 through 11. Causal analysis, primarily using activation patching supported by ablation results, reveals a clear division of labor: Attention Heads act as "evidence gatherers", providing necessary low-level information for partial signal recovery, while MLP Blocks function as robust "concept composers", each of which is the primary driver to generate the "success" signal. This distributed and redundant circuit in the model's internals explains its resilience to simple ablations, demonstrating a core computational pattern for processing human-action outcomes. Crucially, the existence of this sophisticated circuit for representing complex outcomes, even within a model trained only for simple classification, highlights the potential for models to develop forms of 'hidden knowledge' beyond their explicit task, underscoring the need for mechanistic oversight for building genuinely Explainable and Trustworthy AI systems intended for deployment.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Circuits and mechanistic analysis, one of 13 directions in Mechanistic interpretability. Builds on 2 of its 5 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 Mar 2026.
Builds on
2 of 5 references.
References · 2
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
- 2022Discovering Latent Knowledge in Language Models Without Supervisioncited by 767
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025Mechanistic Interpretability of Fine-Tuned Vision Transformers on Distorted Images: Decoding Attention Head Behavior for Transparent and Trustworthy AI
- 2026Interpreting Transformers Through Attention Head Intervention
- 2026Closure-Validated Circuit Discovery in Attention Heads: Co-activation Proposes, Ablation Disposes
- 2026Pattern Selectivity is Not Task-Causal Structure: A Cross-Architecture Mechanistic Study of Composed-Task Circuits in 1B-Class Language Models
- 2026CRAFT: Causal Responsibility and Failure Tracing in Medical Vision Language Models
- 2026Cross-Layer Interaction under Weight-Space Ablation: A Closed-Form Attention Jacobian Bound and a Test on a Real Pretrained Model
- 2026Finding Interpretable Prompt-Specific Circuits in Language Models
- 2026Temporal-Attention Head Specialization During Video Diffusion Training