Finding Interpretable Prompt-Specific Circuits in Language Models
On the map: Mechanistic interpretability → Circuits and mechanistic analysis
Abstract (arXiv)
Understanding the internal circuits that language models use to solve tasks remains a central challenge in mechanistic interpretability. A crucial part of finding circuits is understanding why each attention head attends where it does. To this end, we introduce ACC++, an improved circuit-tracing method based on the principle of attention-causal communication (ACC) [1], which identifies signals, i.e., contents of low dimensional subspaces that cause attention on a token pair. ACC++ extracts circuits from a single forward pass, without replacement models or patching. Circuits identified by ACC++ consist of components that are causal for the model's attention decisions, together with the low-dimensional signals used to communicate between them. Here, we first detail the conceptual advances that ACC++ makes over previous work. We then show that across multiple models, a substantial portion of ACC++ signals are interpretable: many signals admit a short natural-language description. We next present a number of new insights into model behavior obtained via ACC++. First, we use ACC++'s interpretable circuits to characterize the sensitivity of indirect object identification (IOI) circuits to prompt structure. We find that prompt-specific circuits form well-defined clusters, and across clusters, heads receive systematically different signals corresponding to distinct mechanisms for identifying the IO name. Next, in multilingual IOI, ACC++ circuits show that while model components are reused across languages, signals are often language-specific. In a four-language IOI case study, cross-language circuit distances are consistent with linguistic relatedness. Together, these results show that ACC++ can shed light on a broad spectrum of model behaviors.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Circuits and mechanistic analysis, one of 13 directions in Mechanistic interpretability. First posted on arXiv 13 Feb 2026.
Builds on
0 of 0 references.
No references here yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026Slaying the Hydra: Interaction-Aware Circuit Discovery in Language Models
- 2026Pattern Selectivity is Not Task-Causal Structure: A Cross-Architecture Mechanistic Study of Composed-Task Circuits in 1B-Class Language Models
- 2026Architecture, Not Scale: Circuit Localization in Large Language Models
- 2024Sparse Feature Circuits: Discovering and Editing Interpretable Causal Graphs in Language Models
- 2026Causally Grounded Mechanistic Interpretability for LLMs with Faithful Natural-Language Explanations
- 2025Causal Head Gating: A Framework for Interpreting Roles of Attention Heads in Transformers
- 2026Attention as a Routing Graph: Live Circuit Extraction from a Single Forward Pass
- 2023Circuit Component Reuse Across Tasks in Transformer Language Models