Multi-Stream Perturbation Attack: Breaking Safety Alignment of Thinking LLMs Through Concurrent Task Interference
On the map: LLM reasoning → Reasoning for agents, planning and code
also in 2 more
Abstract (arXiv)
The widespread adoption of thinking mode in large language models (LLMs) has significantly enhanced complex task processing capabilities while introducing new security risks. When subjected to jailbreak attacks, the step-by-step reasoning process may cause models to generate more detailed harmful content. We observe that thinking mode exhibits unique vulnerabilities when processing interleaved multiple tasks. Based on this observation, we propose multi-stream perturbation attack, which generates superimposed interference by interweaving multiple task streams within a single prompt. We design three perturbation strategies: multi-stream interleaving, inversion perturbation, and shape transformation, which disrupt the thinking process through concurrent task interleaving, character reversal, and format constraints respectively. On JailbreakBench, AdvBench, and HarmBench datasets, our method achieves attack success rates exceeding most methods across mainstream models including Qwen3 series, DeepSeek, Qwen3-Max, and Gemini 2.5 Flash. Experiments show thinking collapse rates and response repetition rates reach up to 17% and 60% respectively, indicating multi-stream perturbation not only bypasses safety mechanisms but also causes thinking process collapse or repetitive outputs.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Reasoning for agents, planning and code, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 15 of its 46 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Mar 2026.
Builds on
15 of 46 references.
Closest ancestors · 2
Same direction, newest first
- 2025Demonstrating specification gaming in reasoning models18 Feb
- 2024OpenAI o1 System Card21 Dec
Other references · 13
- 2025Qwen3 Technical Reportcited by 8,195
- 2025Gemini 2.5: Pushing the Frontier with Advanced Reasoning, Multimodality, Long Context, and Next Generation Agentic Capabilitiescited by 3,655
- 2022Training a Helpful and Harmless Assistant with Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedbackcited by 3,634
- 2023Universal and Transferable Adversarial Attacks on Aligned Language Modelscited by 2,914
- 2023Llama Guard: LLM-based Input-Output Safeguard for Human-AI Conversationscited by 1,124
- 2023Baseline Defenses for Adversarial Attacks Against Aligned Language Modelscited by 608
- 2025Kimi K2: Open Agentic Intelligencecited by 523
- 2023Jailbreaking ChatGPT via Prompt Engineering: An Empirical Studycited by 478
- 2023Jailbreak and Guard Aligned Language Models with Only Few In-Context Demonstrationscited by 401
- 2025From System 1 to System 2: A Survey of Reasoning Large Language Modelscited by 319
- 2021Recursively Summarizing Books with Human Feedbackcited by 287
- 2025Qwen3Guard Technical Reportcited by 125
1 more
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2023Cognitive Overload: Jailbreaking Large Language Models with Overloaded Logical Thinking
- 2025SafeTy Reasoning Elicitation Alignment for Multi-Turn Dialogues
- 2024No Two Devils Alike: Unveiling Distinct Mechanisms of Fine-tuning Attacks
- 2025System Prompt Poisoning: Persistent Attacks on Large Language Models Beyond User Injection
- 2025The Cost of Thinking: Increased Jailbreak Risk in Large Language Models
- 2026Fragile Thoughts: How Large Language Models Handle Chain-of-Thought Perturbations
- 2024Jailbreaking Large Language Models Through Alignment Vulnerabilities in Out-of-Distribution Settings
- 2026When Skills Meet Safety: Benchmarking and Characterizing the Adaptive Jailbreak Robustness of Skill-Merged LLMs