mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Good Reasoning Makes Good Demonstrations: Implicit Reasoning Quality Supervision via In-Context Reinforcement Learning

arXiv 2603.09803 ↗First posted 10 Mar 2026cs.LGcited by 3

On the map: LLM reasoning → Reinforcement learning for reasoning

Abstract (arXiv)

Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards (RLVR) improves reasoning in large language models but treats all correct solutions equally, potentially reinforcing flawed traces that arrive at correct answers by chance. We observe that better reasoning makes better demonstrations: high-quality solutions serve as more effective in-context examples than low-quality ones. We term this teaching ability Demonstration Utility, and show that the policy model's own in-context learning ability provides an efficient way to measure it, yielding a quality signal termed Evidence Gain. To leverage this signal during training, we introduce In-Context RLVR, which prepends demonstrations before each rollout. Theoretically, we prove that this simple input modification implicitly reweights rewards by a factor approximately proportional to Evidence Gain, assigning higher weights to high-quality traces without requiring costly computation. Experiments on mathematical reasoning benchmarks demonstrate consistent improvements in both accuracy and reasoning quality over standard RLVR baselines. Our codes and datasets are available at https://github.com/Mithas-114/IC-DAPO.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Reinforcement learning for reasoning, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 0 of its 42 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Mar 2026.

Builds on

0 of 42 references.

No references here yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 3.

3 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025The Reasoning Boundary Paradox: How Reinforcement Learning Constrains Language Models
  2. 2025Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards Implicitly Incentivizes Correct Reasoning in Base LLMs
  3. 2025From Harm to Help: Turning Reasoning In-Context Demos into Assets for Reasoning LMs
  4. 2025Rethinking Sample Polarity in Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards
  5. 2025ConfClip: Confidence-Weighted and Clipped Reward for Reinforcement Learning in LLMs
  6. 2026SUPERNOVA: Eliciting General Reasoning in LLMs with Reinforcement Learning on Natural Instructions
  7. 2025The Surprising Effectiveness of Negative Reinforcement in LLM Reasoning
  8. 2026Training Reasoning Models on Saturated Problems via Failure-Prefix Conditioning