Good Reasoning Makes Good Demonstrations: Implicit Reasoning Quality Supervision via In-Context Reinforcement Learning
On the map: LLM reasoning → Reinforcement learning for reasoning
Abstract (arXiv)
Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards (RLVR) improves reasoning in large language models but treats all correct solutions equally, potentially reinforcing flawed traces that arrive at correct answers by chance. We observe that better reasoning makes better demonstrations: high-quality solutions serve as more effective in-context examples than low-quality ones. We term this teaching ability Demonstration Utility, and show that the policy model's own in-context learning ability provides an efficient way to measure it, yielding a quality signal termed Evidence Gain. To leverage this signal during training, we introduce In-Context RLVR, which prepends demonstrations before each rollout. Theoretically, we prove that this simple input modification implicitly reweights rewards by a factor approximately proportional to Evidence Gain, assigning higher weights to high-quality traces without requiring costly computation. Experiments on mathematical reasoning benchmarks demonstrate consistent improvements in both accuracy and reasoning quality over standard RLVR baselines. Our codes and datasets are available at https://github.com/Mithas-114/IC-DAPO.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Reinforcement learning for reasoning, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 0 of its 42 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Mar 2026.
Builds on
0 of 42 references.
No references here yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 3.
3 papers.
- 2026ProRL: Effective Reinforcement Learning for Proactive Recommendation via Rectified Policy Gradient Estimationcited by 1
- 2026EvoRS: On-Policy Self-Evolution of Reward Systems for Open-Ended Reinforcement Learningcited by 0
- 2026Unlearnable, or Unmeasured? On the Reliability of Difficulty Labels in RLVRcited by 0
- 2026Unlearnable, or Unmeasured? On the Reliability of Difficulty Labels in RLVR30 Sep 2026
- 2026EvoRS: On-Policy Self-Evolution of Reward Systems for Open-Ended Reinforcement Learning11 Sep 2026
- 2026ProRL: Effective Reinforcement Learning for Proactive Recommendation via Rectified Policy Gradient Estimation27 May 2026
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025The Reasoning Boundary Paradox: How Reinforcement Learning Constrains Language Models
- 2025Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards Implicitly Incentivizes Correct Reasoning in Base LLMs
- 2025From Harm to Help: Turning Reasoning In-Context Demos into Assets for Reasoning LMs
- 2025Rethinking Sample Polarity in Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards
- 2025ConfClip: Confidence-Weighted and Clipped Reward for Reinforcement Learning in LLMs
- 2026SUPERNOVA: Eliciting General Reasoning in LLMs with Reinforcement Learning on Natural Instructions
- 2025The Surprising Effectiveness of Negative Reinforcement in LLM Reasoning
- 2026Training Reasoning Models on Saturated Problems via Failure-Prefix Conditioning