Common Sense vs. Morality: The Curious Case of Narrative Focus Bias in LLMs
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly deployed across diverse real-world applications and user communities. As such, it is crucial that these models remain both morally grounded and knowledge-aware. In this work, we uncover a critical limitation of current LLMs -- their tendency to prioritize moral reasoning over commonsense understanding. To investigate this phenomenon, we introduce CoMoral, a novel benchmark dataset containing commonsense contradictions embedded within moral dilemmas. Through extensive evaluation of ten LLMs across different model sizes, we find that existing models consistently struggle to identify such contradictions without prior signal. Furthermore, we observe a pervasive narrative focus bias, wherein LLMs more readily detect commonsense contradictions when they are attributed to a secondary character rather than the primary (narrator) character. Our comprehensive analysis underscores the need for enhanced reasoning-aware training to improve the commonsense robustness of large language models.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 29 of its 47 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Mar 2026.
Builds on
29 of 47 references.
References · 29
- 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,192
- 2024Gemma 2: Improving Open Language Models at a Practical Sizecited by 1,928
- 2025Gemma 3 Technical Reportcited by 1,686
- 2025gpt-oss-120b & gpt-oss-20b Model Cardcited by 1,258
- 2024LLMs-as-Judges: A Comprehensive Survey on LLM-based Evaluation Methodscited by 451
- 2023Trustworthy LLMs: a Survey and Guideline for Evaluating Large Language Models' Alignmentcited by 394
- 2023Large Language Models as Commonsense Knowledge for Large-Scale Task Planningcited by 231
- 2024Modular Pluralism: Pluralistic Alignment via Multi-LLM Collaborationcited by 111
- 2025Expressing stigma and inappropriate responses prevents LLMs from safely replacing mental health providerscited by 67
- 2023Ethical Reasoning over Moral Alignment: A Case and Framework for In-Context Ethical Policies in LLMscited by 64
- 2024DailyDilemmas: Revealing Value Preferences of LLMs with Quandaries of Daily Lifecited by 57
- 2021Socially Responsible AI Algorithms: Issues, Purposes, and Challengescited by 56
17 more
- 2024Large Language Model Safety: A Holistic Surveycited by 56
- 2024Understanding the Capabilities and Limitations of Large Language Models for Cultural Commonsensecited by 50
- 2023Say What You Mean! Large Language Models Speak Too Positively about Negative Commonsense Knowledgecited by 32
- 2023Large Language Models (GPT) Struggle to Answer Multiple-Choice Questions about Codecited by 31
- 2024Enhancing Ethical Explanations of Large Language Models through Iterative Symbolic Refinementcited by 16
- 2024Commonsense Knowledge Editing Based on Free-Text in LLMscited by 16
- 2024Exploring and steering the moral compass of Large Language Modelscited by 15
- 2025Aligned but Blind: Alignment Increases Implicit Bias by Reducing Awareness of Racecited by 15
- 2025Are Rules Meant to be Broken? Understanding Multilingual Moral Reasoning as a Computational Pipeline with UniMoralcited by 14
- 2024Moral Persuasion in Large Language Models: Evaluating Susceptibility and Ethical Alignmentcited by 10
- 2024Beyond Labels: Aligning Large Language Models with Human-like Reasoningcited by 6
- 2025Around the World in 24 Hours: Probing LLM Knowledge of Time and Placecited by 6
- 2024Unveiling Narrative Reasoning Limits of Large Language Models with Trope in Movie Synopsescited by 4
- 2024LINKED: Eliciting, Filtering and Integrating Knowledge in Large Language Model for Commonsense Reasoningcited by 3
- 2023A collection of principles for guiding and evaluating large language modelscited by 2
- 2024Safe to Serve: Aligning Instruction-Tuned Models for Safety and Helpfulnesscited by 2
- 2024ConKE: Conceptualization-Augmented Knowledge Editing in Large Language Models for Commonsense Reasoningcited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.