Data-driven robust Markov decision processes on Borel spaces: performance guarantees via an axiomatic approach
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We consider Markov decision processes (MDPs) with unknown disturbance distribution and address this problem using the robust Markov decision process (RMDP) approach. We construct the empirical distribution of the unknown disturbance distribution and characterize our ambiguity set of distributions as the sublevel set of a nonnegative distance function from the empirical distribution. By connecting the weak convergence of distributions to convergence with respect to the distance function, we prove that the robust optimal value function and the out-of-sample value function converge to the true optimal value function with increasing sample-sizes. We establish that, for finite sample-sizes, the robust optimal value function serves as a high probability upper bound on the out-of-sample value function. We also obtain probabilistic convergence rates, sample complexity bounds, and out-of-distribution performance bounds. The finite sample performance guarantees rely on the distance function satisfying a certain concentration type inequality. Several well-studied distances in the literature meet the requirements imposed on the distance function. We also analyze the data-driven properties of empirical MDPs and demonstrate that, unlike our data-driven RMDPs, empirical MDPs fail to satisfy some of the finite sample performance guarantees.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 21 of its 67 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 9 Mar 2026.
Builds on
21 of 67 references.
References · 21
- 2021Sample Complexity of Robust Reinforcement Learning with a Generative Modelcited by 83
- 2023The Curious Price of Distributional Robustness in Reinforcement Learning with a Generative Modelcited by 52
- 2023Improved Sample Complexity Bounds for Distributionally Robust Reinforcement Learningcited by 44
- 2017From Data to Decisions: Distributionally Robust Optimization is Optimalcited by 38
- 2018Wasserstein Distributionally Robust Stochastic Control: A Data-Driven Approachcited by 29
- 2020On Linear Optimization over Wasserstein Ballscited by 24
- 2023Towards Minimax Optimality of Model-based Robust Reinforcement Learningcited by 22
- 2024Overcoming the Sim-to-Real Gap: Leveraging Simulation to Learn to Explore for Real-World RLcited by 21
- 2023On the Foundation of Distributionally Robust Reinforcement Learningcited by 18
- 2023Distributionally Robust Model-based Reinforcement Learning with Large State Spacescited by 17
- 2020Distributionally Robust Markov Decision Processes and their Connection to Risk Measurescited by 14
- 2023Certified Robust Neural Networks: Generalization and Corruption Resistancecited by 11
9 more
- 2019Data-driven ambiguity sets with probabilistic guarantees for dynamic processescited by 9
- 2020Wasserstein Distributionally Robust Motion Control for Collision Avoidance Using Conditional Value-at-Riskcited by 8
- 2021Distributional robustness in minimax linear quadratic control with Wasserstein distancecited by 7
- 2018Robustness to incorrect system models in stochastic controlcited by 5
- 2022Wasserstein Distributionally Robust Control of Partially Observable Linear Stochastic Systemscited by 4
- 2023Distributionally Robust Differential Dynamic Programming with Wasserstein Distancecited by 3
- 2023Bounding the Difference between the Values of Robust and Non-Robust Markov Decision Problemscited by 3
- 2015Infinite Horizon Average Cost Dynamic Programming Subject to Total Variation Distance Ambiguitycited by 1
- 2024Model approximation in MDPs with unbounded per-step costcited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.