Distributionally Robust Markov Decision Processes and their Connection to Risk Measures
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We consider robust Markov Decision Processes with Borel state and action spaces, unbounded cost and finite time horizon. Our formulation leads to a Stackelberg game against nature. Under integrability, continuity and compactness assumptions we derive a robust cost iteration for a fixed policy of the decision maker and a value iteration for the robust optimization problem. Moreover, we show the existence of deterministic optimal policies for both players. This is in contrast to classical zero-sum games. In case the state space is the real line we show under some convexity assumptions that the interchange of supremum and infimum is possible with the help of Sion's minimax Theorem. Further, we consider the problem with special ambiguity sets. In particular we are able to derive some cases where the robust optimization problem coincides with the minimization of a coherent risk measure. In the final section we discuss two applications: A robust LQ problem and a robust problem for managing regenerative energy.
Key facts. Cited by 12 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 26 Jul 2020.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 0; 2023: 1; 2024: 5; 2025: 2; 2026: 3.
12 papers.
- 2024No Regrets: Investigating and Improving Regret Approximations for Curriculum Discoverycited by 29
- 2021Reinforcement Learning with Dynamic Convex Risk Measurescited by 20
- 2023Soft Robust MDPs and Risk-Sensitive MDPs: Equivalence, Policy Gradient, and Sample Complexitycited by 16
- 2024Refining Minimax Regret for Unsupervised Environment Designcited by 16
- 2024Q-Learning under Finite Model Uncertaintycited by 2
- 2025Distributionally Robust Deep Q-Learningcited by 1
- 2025Optimism as Risk-Seeking in Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learningcited by 1
- 2024The Indoor-Training Effect: unexpected gains from distribution shifts in the transition functioncited by 0
- 2024Risk Sensitivity in Markov Games and Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning: A Systematic Reviewcited by 0
- 2026Decoupling Time and Risk: Risk-Sensitive Reinforcement Learning with General Discountingcited by 0
- 2026Data-driven robust Markov decision processes on Borel spaces: performance guarantees via an axiomatic approachcited by 0
- 2026Robust Q-learning for mean-field control under Wasserstein uncertainty in common noisecited by 0
- 2026Robust Q-learning for mean-field control under Wasserstein uncertainty in common noise18 Jun 2026
- 2026Data-driven robust Markov decision processes on Borel spaces: performance guarantees via an axiomatic approach9 Mar 2026
- 2026Decoupling Time and Risk: Risk-Sensitive Reinforcement Learning with General Discounting4 Feb 2026
- 2025Optimism as Risk-Seeking in Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning28 Sep 2025
- 2025Distributionally Robust Deep Q-Learning25 May 2025
- 2024No Regrets: Investigating and Improving Regret Approximations for Curriculum Discovery27 Aug 2024
- 2024Q-Learning under Finite Model Uncertainty5 Jul 2024
- 2024Risk Sensitivity in Markov Games and Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning: A Systematic Review10 Jun 2024
- 2024Refining Minimax Regret for Unsupervised Environment Design19 Feb 2024
- 2024The Indoor-Training Effect: unexpected gains from distribution shifts in the transition function29 Jan 2024
- 2023Soft Robust MDPs and Risk-Sensitive MDPs: Equivalence, Policy Gradient, and Sample Complexity20 Jun 2023
- 2021Reinforcement Learning with Dynamic Convex Risk Measures26 Dec 2021