Unifying Distributional Training for One-Step Visual Generation
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Distributional training provides collective supervision for one-step visual generation by matching real and generated features in frozen representation spaces. We introduce a unified theoretical framework that separates distribution modeling from matching discrepancy and connects global objectives to pointwise feature updates through Wasserstein gradient flow. Under this framework, FD-Loss and Gaussian-kernel Drifting are recovered through Gaussian optimal transport and kernel-density-based KL matching, respectively. The framework motivates MGFlow, which models feature distributions with Gaussian mixtures at an adjustable granularity between global moments and sample-based representations. MGFlow supports both optimal transport and score-based matching, and couples mass-constrained sample assignment with paired component updates to address mode collapse that mixture expressivity alone does not resolve. On ImageNet 256×256, MGFlow substantially surpasses the FD-Loss baseline, achieving state-of-the-art results with 1.45 FDr6 on pMF-H and 1.64 on JiT-H. For text-to-image generation, MGFlow post-trains FLUX.2 [klein] 4B into a one-step generator that outperforms the original four-step model on both GenEval and PickScore.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 58 of its 74 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 Sep 2026.
Builds on
58 of 74 references.
References · 58
- 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,744
- 2014Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Contextcited by 17,608
- 2014ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challengecited by 8,498
- 2023DINOv2: Learning Robust Visual Features without Supervisioncited by 7,974
- 2021Masked Autoencoders Are Scalable Vision Learnerscited by 7,403
- 2022Classifier-Free Diffusion Guidancecited by 5,847
- 2015Rethinking the Inception Architecture for Computer Visioncited by 5,475
- 2016Improved Techniques for Training GANscited by 2,970
- 2013Sinkhorn Distances: Lightspeed Computation of Optimal Transportation Distancescited by 2,316
- 2023Consistency Modelscited by 1,822
- 2025SigLIP 2: Multilingual Vision-Language Encoders with Improved Semantic Understanding, Localization, and Dense Featurescited by 1,188
- 2024Visual Autoregressive Modeling: Scalable Image Generation via Next-Scale Predictioncited by 1,023
38 more
- 2023One-step Diffusion with Distribution Matching Distillationcited by 1,019
- 2023Pick-a-Pic: An Open Dataset of User Preferences for Text-to-Image Generationcited by 977
- 2023GenEval: An Object-Focused Framework for Evaluating Text-to-Image Alignmentcited by 972
- 2023Latent Consistency Models: Synthesizing High-Resolution Images with Few-Step Inferencecited by 846
- 2024SiT: Exploring Flow and Diffusion-based Generative Models with Scalable Interpolant Transformerscited by 737
- 2023ConvNeXt V2: Co-designing and Scaling ConvNets with Masked Autoencoderscited by 712
- 2024Representation Alignment for Generation: Training Diffusion Transformers Is Easier Than You Thinkcited by 703
- 2024Improved Distribution Matching Distillation for Fast Image Synthesiscited by 684
- 2024Autoregressive Image Generation without Vector Quantizationcited by 651
- 2025Mean Flows for One-step Generative Modelingcited by 561
- 2023Consistency Trajectory Models: Learning Probability Flow ODE Trajectory of Diffusioncited by 459
- 2023Improved Techniques for Training Consistency Modelscited by 439
- 2025Reconstruction vs. Generation: Taming Optimization Dilemma in Latent Diffusion Modelscited by 393
- 2024One Step Diffusion via Shortcut Modelscited by 391
- 2025Diffusion Transformers with Representation Autoencoderscited by 295
- 2024Simplifying, Stabilizing and Scaling Continuous-Time Consistency Modelscited by 283
- 2024Fast High-Resolution Image Synthesis with Latent Adversarial Diffusion Distillationcited by 279
- 2015Generative Moment Matching Networkscited by 257
- 2024Applying Guidance in a Limited Interval Improves Sample and Distribution Quality in Diffusion Modelscited by 254
- 2025REPA-E: Unlocking VAE for End-to-End Tuning with Latent Diffusion Transformerscited by 225
- 2024Score identity Distillation: Exponentially Fast Distillation of Pretrained Diffusion Models for One-Step Generationcited by 214
- 2024Consistency Models Made Easycited by 144
- 2021Scaling Deep Contrastive Learning Batch Size under Memory Limited Setupcited by 127
- 2026Generative Modeling via Driftingcited by 116
- 2025Improved Mean Flows: On the Challenges of Fastforward Generative Modelscited by 110
- 2025DDT: Decoupled Diffusion Transformercited by 109
- 2025Representation Entanglement for Generation: Training Diffusion Transformers Is Much Easier Than You Thinkcited by 102
- 2025PixNerd: Pixel Neural Field Diffusioncited by 82
- 2024FlowAR: Scale-wise Autoregressive Image Generation Meets Flow Matchingcited by 80
- 2019A Wasserstein-type distance in the space of Gaussian Mixture Modelscited by 75
- 2026One-step Latent-free Image Generation with Pixel Mean Flowscited by 53
- 2026Representation Fr'echet Loss for Visual Generationcited by 37
- 2020Blindness of score-based methods to isolated components and mixing proportionscited by 34
- 2026One-Step Generative Modeling via Wasserstein Gradient Flowscited by 24
- 2025Latent Denoising Makes Good Tokenizerscited by 20
- 2026Generative Drifting is Secretly Score Matching: a Spectral and Variational Perspectivecited by 20
- 2026Gradient Flow Drifting: Generative Modeling via Wasserstein Gradient Flows of KDE-Approximated Divergencescited by 17
- 2026Drifting Fields are not Conservativecited by 13
50 most cited of 58 All 58 (JSON)
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.
- 2026Sphere Encoder 2cited by 0
- 2026Sphere Encoder 21 Oct 2026