mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

The Dual-Stream Transformer: Channelized Architecture for Interpretable Language Modeling

arXiv 2603.07461 ↗First posted 8 Mar 2026cs.CL cs.AI cs.LGcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Standard transformers entangle all computation in a single residual stream, obscuring which components perform which functions. We introduce the Dual-Stream Transformer, which decomposes the residual stream into two functionally distinct components: a token stream updated by attention and a context stream updated by feed-forward networks. Information flow between attention heads is controlled through a hierarchy of mixing strategies, from fully independent (maximum interpretability) to dense (standard transformer behavior). This design exposes a tunable tradeoff between interpretability and performance. We measure this tradeoff on language modeling tasks at 29M parameters. Fully independent head mixing increases validation loss by 8% relative to dense baselines. The recommended Kronecker mixing strategy, which permits scalar communication between heads while preserving within-head structure, costs only 2.5%. All configurations maintain functional generation under attention amplification (scaling logits by factors up to 16 at inference time), with degradation ranging from 16% to 27%. This robustness suggests the architectures learn discrete algorithms that operate independently of soft probabilistic mixing. The architecture provides a foundation for interpretable language models where internal structure is exposed by design. footnoteThis work was partially supported by DARPA Contract HR001125C0302.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 35 of its 43 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Mar 2026.

Builds on

35 of 43 references.

References · 35

  1. 2021RoFormer: Enhanced Transformer with Rotary Position Embeddingcited by 4,581
  2. 2017Outrageously Large Neural Networks: The Sparsely-Gated Mixture-of-Experts Layercited by 3,413
  3. 2017Axiomatic Attribution for Deep Networkscited by 3,350
  4. 2021Switch Transformers: Scaling to Trillion Parameter Models with Simple and Efficient Sparsitycited by 3,014
  5. 2022Locating and Editing Factual Associations in GPTcited by 2,609
  6. 2020DeBERTa: Decoding-enhanced BERT with Disentangled Attentioncited by 2,157
  7. 2019Generating Long Sequences with Sparse Transformerscited by 1,523
  8. 2023Sparse Autoencoders Find Highly Interpretable Features in Language Modelscited by 1,359
  9. 2020Transformer Feed-Forward Layers Are Key-Value Memoriescited by 1,307
  10. 2022Interpretability in the Wild: a Circuit for Indirect Object Identification in GPT-2 smallcited by 1,130
  11. 2021Train Short, Test Long: Attention with Linear Biases Enables Input Length Extrapolationcited by 1,085
  12. 2019BERT Rediscovers the Classical NLP Pipelinecited by 1,046
23 more
  1. 2019What Does BERT Look At? An Analysis of BERT's Attentioncited by 994
  2. 2022In-context Learning and Induction Headscited by 930
  3. 2022Toy Models of Superpositioncited by 928
  4. 2019Attention is not Explanationcited by 916
  5. 2019Analyzing Multi-Head Self-Attention: Specialized Heads Do the Heavy Lifting, the Rest Can Be Prunedcited by 844
  6. 2021Probing Classifiers: Promises, Shortcomings, and Advancescited by 831
  7. 2024Training Large Language Models to Reason in a Continuous Latent Spacecited by 763
  8. 2019Attention is not not Explanationcited by 629
  9. 2021Causal Abstractions of Neural Networkscited by 401
  10. 2015Neural Module Networkscited by 375
  11. 2019Revealing the Dark Secrets of BERTcited by 300
  12. 2025Gated Attention for Large Language Models: Non-linearity, Sparsity, and Attention-Sink-Freecited by 266
  13. 2023The Hydra Effect: Emergent Self-repair in Language Model Computationscited by 145
  14. 2021Position Information in Transformers: An Overviewcited by 103
  15. 2024Softmax is not Enough (for Sharp Size Generalisation)cited by 42
  16. 2023Seeing is Believing: Brain-Inspired Modular Training for Mechanistic Interpretabilitycited by 38
  17. 2024Selective Attention Improves Transformercited by 26
  18. 2025Cognitive Mirrors: Exploring the Diverse Functional Roles of Attention Heads in LLM Reasoningcited by 5
  19. 2025Learning When to Stop: Adaptive Latent Reasoning via Reinforcement Learningcited by 4
  20. 2025JEPA-Reasoner: Decoupling Latent Reasoning from Token Generationcited by 4
  21. 2025MoKA: Mixture of Kronecker Adapterscited by 2
  22. 2026Weights to Code: Extracting Interpretable Algorithms from the Discrete Transformercited by 2
  23. 2025Weaver: Kronecker Product Approximations of Spatiotemporal Attention for Traffic Network Forecastingcited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 3.

3 papers.