Three-Phase Transformer
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We present Three-Phase Transformer (3PT), a residual-stream structural prior for decoder-only Transformers on a standard SwiGLU + RMSNorm + RoPE + GQA backbone. The hidden vector is partitioned into N equally-sized cyclic channels, each maintained by phase-respecting ops: a per-channel RMSNorm, a 2D Givens rotation between attention and FFN that rotates each channel by theta + i*(2*pi/N), and a head-count constraint aligning GQA heads with the partition. The architecture is a self-stabilizing equilibrium between scrambling and re-imposition, not a bolted-on module. The partition carves out a one-dimensional DC subspace orthogonal to the channels, into which we inject a fixed Gabriel's horn profile r(p) = 1/(p+1) as an absolute-position side-channel composing orthogonally with RoPE's relative-position rotation. The canonical N=3 borrows its metaphor from balanced three-phase AC, where three sinusoids 120 degrees apart sum to zero with no anti-correlated pair. At 123M parameters on WikiText-103, 3PT achieves -7.20% perplexity (-2.62% bits-per-byte) over a matched RoPE-Only baseline at +1,536 parameters (0.00124% of total), with 1.93x step-count convergence speedup (1.64x wall-clock). N behaves as a parameter-sharing knob rather than a unique optimum: at 5.5M an N-sweep over {1,2,3,4,6,8,12} is near-monotone with N=1 winning; at 123M a three-seed sweep finds N=3 and N=1 statistically indistinguishable. The load-bearing mechanism is the channel-partitioned residual stream, per-block rotation, per-phase normalization, and horn DC injection. We characterize (a) self-stabilization of the geometry without explicit enforcement, a novel instance of the conservation-law framework for neural networks; (b) a U-shaped depth profile of rotation-angle drift at 12 layers; (c) orthogonal composition with RoPE, attention, and FFN.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 20 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 Apr 2026.
Builds on
18 of 20 references.
References · 18
- 2021RoFormer: Enhanced Transformer with Rotary Position Embeddingcited by 4,703
- 2016Gaussian Error Linear Units (GELUs)cited by 3,502
- 2023Vision Transformers Need Registerscited by 871
- 2023TinyStories: How Small Can Language Models Be and Still Speak Coherent English?cited by 449
- 2019Fixup Initialization: Residual Learning Without Normalizationcited by 198
- 2021Primer: Searching for Efficient Transformers for Language Modelingcited by 164
- 2020Neural Mechanics: Symmetry and Broken Conservation Laws in Deep Learning Dynamicscited by 96
- 2021Do Transformer Modifications Transfer Across Implementations and Applications?cited by 87
- 2021NormFormer: Improved Transformer Pretraining with Extra Normalizationcited by 83
- 2024Contextual Position Encoding: Learning to Count What's Importantcited by 54
- 2023Abide by the Law and Follow the Flow: Conservation Laws for Gradient Flowscited by 45
- 2022Symmetries, flat minima, and the conserved quantities of gradient flowcited by 35
6 more
- 2024LieRE: Lie Rotational Positional Encodingscited by 18
- 2025Transformative or Conservative? Conservation laws for ResNets and Transformerscited by 7
- 2026Rotary Positional Embeddings as Phase Modulation: Theoretical Bounds on the RoPE Base for Long-Context Transformerscited by 7
- 2024Transformer Normalisation Layers and the Independence of Semantic Subspacescited by 6
- 2025Deconstructing Positional Information: From Attention Logits to Training Biasescited by 5
- 2026The Dual-Stream Transformer: Channelized Architecture for Interpretable Language Modelingcited by 3
Built on by
Not cited yet.