mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

VIVECaption: A Split Approach to Caption Quality Improvement

arXiv 2603.07401 ↗First posted 8 Mar 2026cs.CVcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Caption quality has emerged as a critical bottleneck in training high-quality text-to-image (T2I) and text-to-video (T2V) generative models. While visual language models (VLMs) are commonly deployed to generate captions from visual data, they suffer from hallucinations, poor compositional reasoning, and limited fine-grained understanding, resulting in misaligned image-caption pairs that degrade downstream model performance. This technical report introduces VIVECaption, a systematic two-sided approach to caption quality improvement. We first establish a comprehensive taxonomy of caption evaluation metrics, distinguishing between "universal" and "instance-grounded" metrics, with the ultimate goal of showcasing the use-cases and tradeoffs between different caption quality metrics. We then use this language to describe our two-sided approach to caption quality improvement: (1) a gold-standard dataset creation methodology using stratified sampling and (2) a model alignment strategy encompassing context alignment and parameter-level finetuning using SFT. We demonstrate our methodology on open-source models, focusing on structured caption formats that enable better parsing and downstream utilization. We ultimately show that using a finetuned character detection model in an image captioning pipeline significantly improves holistic image-caption alignment quality. Our work addresses the growing need for high-quality "vegan" training data in enterprise AI development, providing practical solutions for teams seeking to improve caption-image alignment without relying on potentially copyright-protected web-scraped content.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 9 of its 23 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Mar 2026.

Builds on

9 of 23 references.

References · 9

  1. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,456
  2. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
  3. 2020Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Modelscited by 20,851
  4. 2022DreamBooth: Fine Tuning Text-to-Image Diffusion Models for Subject-Driven Generationcited by 3,286
  5. 2024A Survey on LLM-as-a-Judgecited by 1,384
  6. 2021Grounded Language-Image Pre-trainingcited by 1,147
  7. 2025NoLiMa: Long-Context Evaluation Beyond Literal Matchingcited by 120
  8. 2025Poisoning Attacks on LLMs Require a Near-constant Number of Poison Samplescited by 66
  9. 2023Investigating Prompting Techniques for Zero- and Few-Shot Visual Question Answeringcited by 14

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025CAPability: A Comprehensive Visual Caption Benchmark for Evaluating Both Correctness and Thoroughness
  2. 2025VCapsBench: A Large-scale Fine-grained Benchmark for Video Caption Quality Evaluation
  3. 2025CapArena: Benchmarking and Analyzing Detailed Image Captioning in the LLM Era
  4. 2024Benchmarking and Improving Detail Image Caption
  5. 2024Vision Language Model-based Caption Evaluation Method Leveraging Visual Context Extraction
  6. 2025IF-VidCap: Can Video Caption Models Follow Instructions?
  7. 2023VeCLIP: Improving CLIP Training via Visual-enriched Captions
  8. 2025Structured Captions Improve Prompt Adherence in Text-to-Image Models (Re-LAION-Caption 19M)