mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

EvoESAP: Non-Uniform Expert Pruning for Sparse MoE

arXiv 2603.06003 ↗First posted 6 Mar 2026cs.LGcited by 7

On the map: Mixture-of-experts → MoE large language models

Abstract (arXiv)

Sparse Mixture-of-Experts (SMoE) language models achieve strong capability at low per-token compute, yet deployment remains constrained by memory footprint and throughput because the full expert pool must still be stored and served. Post-training expert pruning reduces this cost, but most methods focus on which experts to prune within each layer and default to a uniform layer-wise sparsity allocation, even though the layer-wise allocation can strongly affect performance. We decouple pruning into within-layer expert ranking and across-layer budget allocation, and introduce Expected Speculative Acceptance Proxy (ESAP), a speculative-decoding-inspired, teacher-forced metric that measures how well a pruned model matches the full model without costly autoregressive decoding. ESAP is bounded and stable, enabling cheap comparison of many candidates. Building on ESAP, we propose EvoESAP, an evolutionary search framework that finds an improved non-uniform layer-wise sparsity allocation under a fixed global budget while holding the within-layer pruning order fixed, making it a plug-and-play method for criteria such as Frequency, EAN, SEER, and REAP. Across 7B--30B SMoE LLMs at 25% and 50% sparsity, EvoESAP consistently discovers non-uniform allocations that improve open-ended generation (up to +19.6% on MATH-500 at 50% sparsity) while preserving competitive multiple-choice accuracy compared with uniform pruning at the same sparsity. Code is available at https://github.com/ZongfangLiu/EvoESAP.

Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in MoE large language models, one of 12 directions in Mixture-of-experts. Builds on 51 of its 62 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 Mar 2026.

Builds on

51 of 62 references.

Closest ancestors · 21

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2025REAP the Experts: Why Pruning Prevails for One-Shot MoE compression15 Oct
  2. 2025DiEP: Adaptive Mixture-of-Experts Compression through Differentiable Expert Pruning19 Sep
  3. 2025Dropping Experts, Recombining Neurons: Retraining-Free Pruning for Sparse Mixture-of-Experts LLMs12 Sep
  4. 2025Sub-MoE: Efficient Mixture-of-Expert LLMs Compression via Subspace Expert Merging29 Jun
  5. 2025Qwen3 Technical Report14 May
  6. 2025Efficiently Editing Mixture-of-Experts Models with Compressed Experts1 Mar
  7. 2025Delta Decompression for MoE-based LLMs Compression24 Feb
  8. 2024MoE-I2: Compressing Mixture of Experts Models through Inter-Expert Pruning and Intra-Expert Low-Rank Decomposition1 Nov
  9. 2024MoE-Pruner: Pruning Mixture-of-Experts Large Language Model using the Hints from Its Router15 Oct
  10. 2024Retraining-Free Merging of Sparse MoE via Hierarchical Clustering11 Oct
  11. 2024Mixture Compressor for Mixture-of-Experts LLMs Gains More8 Oct
  12. 2024STUN: Structured-Then-Unstructured Pruning for Scalable MoE Pruning10 Sep
9 more
  1. 2024OLMoE: Open Mixture-of-Experts Language Models3 Sep
  2. 2024Diversifying the Expert Knowledge for Task-Agnostic Pruning in Sparse Mixture-of-Experts12 Jul
  3. 2024Efficient Expert Pruning for Sparse Mixture-of-Experts Language Models: Enhancing Performance and Reducing Inference Costs1 Jul
  4. 2024Towards Efficient Mixture of Experts: A Holistic Study of Compression Techniques4 Jun
  5. 2024DeepSeek-V2: A Strong, Economical, and Efficient Mixture-of-Experts Language Model7 May
  6. 2024Not All Experts are Equal: Efficient Expert Pruning and Skipping for Mixture-of-Experts Large Language Models22 Feb
  7. 2024Mixtral of Experts8 Jan
  8. 2023Merging Experts into One: Improving Computational Efficiency of Mixture of Experts15 Oct
  9. 2017Outrageously Large Neural Networks: The Sparsely-Gated Mixture-of-Experts Layer23 Jan

Other references · 30

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
  2. 2021LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Modelscited by 14,084
  3. 2021Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problemscited by 9,743
  4. 2020Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understandingcited by 7,768
  5. 2021Measuring Mathematical Problem Solving With the MATH Datasetcited by 5,203
  6. 2018Think you have Solved Question Answering? Try ARC, the AI2 Reasoning Challengecited by 4,710
  7. 2019HellaSwag: Can a Machine Really Finish Your Sentence?cited by 4,018
  8. 2021Switch Transformers: Scaling to Trillion Parameter Models with Simple and Efficient Sparsitycited by 3,014
  9. 2019BoolQ: Exploring the Surprising Difficulty of Natural Yes/No Questionscited by 2,140
  10. 2018Can a Suit of Armor Conduct Electricity? A New Dataset for Open Book Question Answeringcited by 2,114
  11. 2024LiveCodeBench: Holistic and Contamination Free Evaluation of Large Language Models for Codecited by 1,906
  12. 2022Fast Inference from Transformers via Speculative Decodingcited by 1,615
18 more
  1. 2023Is Your Code Generated by ChatGPT Really Correct? Rigorous Evaluation of Large Language Models for Code Generationcited by 1,332
  2. 2025gpt-oss-120b & gpt-oss-20b Model Cardcited by 1,258
  3. 2023Accelerating Large Language Model Decoding with Speculative Samplingcited by 975
  4. 2023A Simple and Effective Pruning Approach for Large Language Modelscited by 776
  5. 2025Kimi K2: Open Agentic Intelligencecited by 523
  6. 2025GLM-4.5: Agentic, Reasoning, and Coding (ARC) Foundation Modelscited by 446
  7. 2024WildBench: Benchmarking LLMs with Challenging Tasks from Real Users in the Wildcited by 211
  8. 2023Outlier Weighed Layerwise Sparsity (OWL): A Missing Secret Sauce for Pruning LLMs to High Sparsitycited by 163
  9. 2020Layer-adaptive sparsity for the Magnitude-based Pruningcited by 122
  10. 2023Merge, Then Compress: Demystify Efficient SMoE with Hints from Its Routing Policycited by 104
  11. 2022The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Random Pruning: Return of the Most Naive Baseline for Sparse Trainingcited by 85
  12. 2022Task-Specific Expert Pruning for Sparse Mixture-of-Expertscited by 69
  13. 2024A Survey on Inference Optimization Techniques for Mixture of Experts Modelscited by 46
  14. 2024SEER-MoE: Sparse Expert Efficiency through Regularization for Mixture-of-Expertscited by 40
  15. 2022Memory-efficient NLLB-200: Language-specific Expert Pruning of a Massively Multilingual Machine Translation Modelcited by 36
  16. 2024AlphaPruning: Using Heavy-Tailed Self Regularization Theory for Improved Layer-wise Pruning of Large Language Modelscited by 35
  17. 2025Finding Fantastic Experts in MoEs: A Unified Study for Expert Dropping Strategies and Observationscited by 19
  18. 2025DarwinLM: Evolutionary Structured Pruning of Large Language Modelscited by 16

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 7.

7 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2024Revisiting SMoE Language Models by Evaluating Inefficiencies with Task Specific Expert Pruning
  2. 2025Cluster-Driven Expert Pruning for Mixture-of-Experts Large Language Models
  3. 2025Mosaic Pruning: A Hierarchical Framework for Generalizable Pruning of Mixture-of-Experts Models
  4. 2026It Takes a MAESTRO To Prune Bad Experts
  5. 2026OMP-MoE: Efficient Expert Pruning for Mixture-of-Experts LLMs via Orthogonal Matching Pursuit
  6. 2026Does a Global Perspective Help Prune Sparse MoEs Elegantly?
  7. 2026FlexMoE: One-for-All Nested Intra-Expert Pruning for MoE Language Models
  8. 2026Higher-order pruning of experts in mixture-of-experts language models