mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Mosaic Pruning: A Hierarchical Framework for Generalizable Pruning of Mixture-of-Experts Models

arXiv 2511.19822 ↗First posted 25 Nov 2025cs.LG cs.AIcited by 11

On the map: Mixture-of-experts → MoE large language models

Abstract (arXiv)

Sparse Mixture-of-Experts (SMoE) architectures have enabled a new frontier in scaling Large Language Models (LLMs), offering superior performance by activating only a fraction of their total parameters during inference. However, their practical deployment is severely hampered by substantial static memory overhead, as all experts must be loaded into memory. Existing post-training pruning methods, while reducing model size, often derive their pruning criteria from a single, general-purpose corpus. This leads to a critical limitation: a catastrophic performance degradation when the pruned model is applied to other domains, necessitating a costly re-pruning for each new domain. To address this generalization gap, we introduce Mosaic Pruning (MoP). The core idea of MoP is to construct a functionally comprehensive set of experts through a structured ``cluster-then-select" process. This process leverages a similarity metric that captures expert performance across different task domains to functionally cluster the experts, and subsequently selects the most representative expert from each cluster based on our proposed Activation Variability Score. Unlike methods that optimize for a single corpus, our proposed Mosaic Pruning ensures that the pruned model retains a functionally complementary set of experts, much like the tiles of a mosaic that together form a complete picture of the original model's capabilities, enabling it to handle diverse downstream tasks.Extensive experiments on various MoE models demonstrate the superiority of our approach. MoP significantly outperforms prior work, achieving a 7.24% gain on general tasks and 8.92% on specialized tasks like math reasoning and code generation.

Key facts. Cited by 11 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in MoE large language models, one of 12 directions in Mixture-of-experts. Builds on 25 of its 35 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 Nov 2025.

Builds on

25 of 35 references.

Closest ancestors · 4

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2022Diversifying Content Generation for Commonsense Reasoning with Mixture of Knowledge Graph Experts14 Mar
  2. 2021Scalable and Efficient MoE Training for Multitask Multilingual Models22 Sep
  3. 2020GShard: Scaling Giant Models with Conditional Computation and Automatic Sharding30 Jun
  4. 2017Outrageously Large Neural Networks: The Sparsely-Gated Mixture-of-Experts Layer23 Jan

Other references · 21

  1. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
  2. 2023LLaMA: Open and Efficient Foundation Language Modelscited by 14,132
  3. 2021Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problemscited by 10,109
  4. 2021Evaluating Large Language Models Trained on Codecited by 8,320
  5. 2020Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understandingcited by 7,963
  6. 2021Measuring Mathematical Problem Solving With the MATH Datasetcited by 5,371
  7. 2018Think you have Solved Question Answering? Try ARC, the AI2 Reasoning Challengecited by 4,886
  8. 2019HellaSwag: Can a Machine Really Finish Your Sentence?cited by 4,100
  9. 2021Switch Transformers: Scaling to Trillion Parameter Models with Simple and Efficient Sparsitycited by 3,073
  10. 2019PIQA: Reasoning about Physical Commonsense in Natural Languagecited by 2,883
  11. 2017A Broad-Coverage Challenge Corpus for Sentence Understanding through Inferencecited by 2,682
  12. 2015Deep Compression: Compressing Deep Neural Networks with Pruning, Trained Quantization and Huffman Codingcited by 2,329
9 more
  1. 2019BoolQ: Exploring the Surprising Difficulty of Natural Yes/No Questionscited by 2,183
  2. 2018Can a Suit of Armor Conduct Electricity? A New Dataset for Open Book Question Answeringcited by 2,164
  3. 2018Don't Give Me the Details, Just the Summary! Topic-Aware Convolutional Neural Networks for Extreme Summarizationcited by 1,317
  4. 2023SparseGPT: Massive Language Models Can Be Accurately Pruned in One-Shotcited by 1,121
  5. 2022DeepSpeed-MoE: Advancing Mixture-of-Experts Inference and Training to Power Next-Generation AI Scalecited by 404
  6. 2022On the Representation Collapse of Sparse Mixture of Expertscited by 157
  7. 2024SEER-MoE: Sparse Expert Efficiency through Regularization for Mixture-of-Expertscited by 40
  8. 202452B to 1T: Lessons Learned via Tele-FLM Seriescited by 11
  9. 2025Making Every Head Count: Sparse Attention Without the Speed-Performance Trade-offcited by 6

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 10.

11 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2024Diversifying the Expert Knowledge for Task-Agnostic Pruning in Sparse Mixture-of-Experts
  2. 2025Cluster-Driven Expert Pruning for Mixture-of-Experts Large Language Models
  3. 2024Efficient Expert Pruning for Sparse Mixture-of-Experts Language Models: Enhancing Performance and Reducing Inference Costs
  4. 2024Not All Experts are Equal: Efficient Expert Pruning and Skipping for Mixture-of-Experts Large Language Models
  5. 2026Higher-order pruning of experts in mixture-of-experts language models
  6. 2026Does a Global Perspective Help Prune Sparse MoEs Elegantly?
  7. 2024Revisiting SMoE Language Models by Evaluating Inefficiencies with Task Specific Expert Pruning
  8. 2026EvoESAP: Non-Uniform Expert Pruning for Sparse MoE