mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Track-SQL: Enhancing Generative Language Models with Dual-Extractive Modules for Schema and Context Tracking in Multi-turn Text-to-SQL

arXiv 2603.05996 ↗First posted 6 Mar 2026cs.CLcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Generative language models have shown significant potential in single-turn Text-to-SQL. However, their performance does not extend equivalently to multi-turn Text-to-SQL. This is primarily due to generative language models' inadequacy in handling the complexities of context information and dynamic schema linking in multi-turn interactions. In this paper, we propose a framework named Track-SQL, which enhances generative language models with dual-extractive modules designed to track schema and contextual changes in multi-turn Text-to-SQL. Specifically, Track-SQL incorporates a Semantic-enhanced Schema Extractor and a Schema-aware Context Extractor. Experimental results demonstrate that Track-SQL achieves state-of-the-art performance on the SparC and CoSQL datasets. Furthermore, detailed ablation studies reveal that Track-SQL significantly improves execution accuracy in multi-turn interactions by 7.1% and 9.55% on these datasets, respectively. Our implementation will be open-sourced at https://github.com/DMIRLAB-Group/Track-SQL.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 23 of its 29 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 Mar 2026.

Builds on

23 of 29 references.

References · 23

  1. 2021LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Modelscited by 14,380
  2. 2019RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approachcited by 13,372
  3. 2019Sentence-BERT: Sentence Embeddings using Siamese BERT-Networkscited by 9,170
  4. 2018Spider: A Large-Scale Human-Labeled Dataset for Complex and Cross-Domain Semantic Parsing and Text-to-SQL Taskcited by 1,139
  5. 2023Can LLM Already Serve as A Database Interface? A BIg Bench for Large-Scale Database Grounded Text-to-SQLscited by 688
  6. 2017Seq2SQL: Generating Structured Queries from Natural Language using Reinforcement Learningcited by 687
  7. 2023RESDSQL: Decoupling Schema Linking and Skeleton Parsing for Text-to-SQLcited by 195
  8. 2024CodeS: Towards Building Open-source Language Models for Text-to-SQLcited by 187
  9. 2019CoSQL: A Conversational Text-to-SQL Challenge Towards Cross-Domain Natural Language Interfaces to Databasescited by 185
  10. 2024CHESS: Contextual Harnessing for Efficient SQL Synthesiscited by 169
  11. 2023C3: Zero-shot Text-to-SQL with ChatGPTcited by 164
  12. 2019SParC: Cross-Domain Semantic Parsing in Contextcited by 144
11 more
  1. 2024MCS-SQL: Leveraging Multiple Prompts and Multiple-Choice Selection For Text-to-SQL Generationcited by 105
  2. 2022RASAT: Integrating Relational Structures into Pretrained Seq2Seq Model for Text-to-SQLcited by 85
  3. 2019Editing-Based SQL Query Generation for Cross-Domain Context-Dependent Questionscited by 80
  4. 2023ACT-SQL: In-Context Learning for Text-to-SQL with Automatically-Generated Chain-of-Thoughtcited by 65
  5. 2022HIE-SQL: History Information Enhanced Network for Context-Dependent Text-to-SQL Semantic Parsingcited by 26
  6. 2022STAR: SQL Guided Pre-Training for Context-dependent Text-to-SQL Parsingcited by 19
  7. 2020Tracking Interaction States for Multi-Turn Text-to-SQL Semantic Parsingcited by 18
  8. 2024CoE-SQL: In-Context Learning for Multi-Turn Text-to-SQL with Chain-of-Editionscited by 13
  9. 2022CQR-SQL: Conversational Question Reformulation Enhanced Context-Dependent Text-to-SQL Parserscited by 11
  10. 2022MIGA: A Unified Multi-task Generation Framework for Conversational Text-to-SQLcited by 5
  11. 2024QDA-SQL: Questions Enhanced Dialogue Augmentation for Multi-Turn Text-to-SQLcited by 5

Built on by

Not cited yet.