mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

When Sensors Fail: Temporal Sequence Models for Robust PPO under Sensor Drift

arXiv 2603.04648 ↗First posted 4 Mar 2026cs.LG cs.AIcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Real-world reinforcement learning systems must operate under distributional drift in their observation streams, yet most policy architectures implicitly assume fully observed and noise-free states. We study robustness of Proximal Policy Optimization (PPO) under temporally persistent sensor failures that induce partial observability and representation shift. To respond to this drift, we augment PPO with temporal sequence models, including Transformers and State Space Models (SSMs), to enable policies to infer missing information from history and maintain performance. Under a stochastic sensor failure process, we prove a high-probability bound on infinite-horizon reward degradation that quantifies how robustness depends on policy smoothness and failure persistence. Empirically, on MuJoCo continuous-control benchmarks with severe sensor dropout, we show Transformer-based sequence policies substantially outperform MLP, RNN, and SSM baselines in robustness, maintaining high returns even when large fractions of sensors are unavailable. These results demonstrate that temporal sequence reasoning provides a principled and practical mechanism for reliable operation under observation drift caused by sensor unreliability.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 12 of its 24 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 Mar 2026.

Builds on

12 of 24 references.

References · 12

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
  2. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
  3. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
  4. 2023Mamba: Linear-Time Sequence Modeling with Selective State Spacescited by 4,616
  5. 2014Learning Phrase Representations using RNN Encoder-Decoder for Statistical Machine Translationcited by 4,016
  6. 2021Efficiently Modeling Long Sequences with Structured State Spacescited by 2,424
  7. 2019Transformer-XL: Attentive Language Models Beyond a Fixed-Length Contextcited by 1,830
  8. 2015Deep Recurrent Q-Learning for Partially Observable MDPscited by 457
  9. 2023Resurrecting Recurrent Neural Networks for Long Sequencescited by 397
  10. 2024UniTS: A Unified Multi-Task Time Series Modelcited by 93
  11. 2024Oscillatory State-Space Modelscited by 35
  12. 2025RLBenchNet: The Right Network for the Right Reinforcement Learning Taskcited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Model-Based Reinforcement Learning under Random Observation Delays
  2. 2026FAR: Failure-Aware Retry for Test-Time Recovery and Continual Policy Improvement
  3. 2026Certified World Models as Sensing Clocks: Drift-Aware Deadlines for Active Perception
  4. 2024Uncertainty Representations in State-Space Layers for Deep Reinforcement Learning under Partial Observability
  5. 2024Reinforcement Learning from Delayed Observations via World Models
  6. 2026A Graph-Based Reinforcement Learning Framework for Structured Drift Diagnosis and Recovery in Autonomous LLM Agents
  7. 2026ESPO: Early-Stopping Proximal Policy Optimization
  8. 2026Drift is a Sampling Error: SNR-Aware Power Distributions for Long-Horizon Robotic Planning