mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

A Graph-Based Reinforcement Learning Framework for Structured Drift Diagnosis and Recovery in Autonomous LLM Agents

arXiv 2608.14109 ↗First posted 14 Aug 2026cs.AI cs.LG cs.MAcited by 0

On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Reinforcement learning for LLM agents

Abstract (arXiv)

Autonomous LLM agents are increasingly deployed in complex real-world workflows, yet they remain vulnerable to runtime behavioral drift, a silent deviation from the original task that can lead to irreversible side effects on external systems. Existing approaches address drift at the prompt level but lack structured mechanisms for step-level detection, risk assessment, and recovery decision. Because the main task-executing agent is often a large and expensive model that cannot be re-trained on every deployment, this work targets a plug-and-play recovery module instead. It introduces a graph-based framework in which a single small language model is trained via reinforcement learning to specialize at each node of a recovery graph, external to the main agent. Each node has a precise role,: drift classification, operation detection, risk evaluation, or final decision and the model learns to produce structured XML-formatted reasoning adapted to that role. Training combines rule-based structural rewards with an LLM-as-judge semantic-quality signal, so that the model is graded both on how it answers (schema and length) and on what it says. Experiments on the public AppWorld benchmark show that the method generally exploits information about the suspected drift onset to issue correct recovery decisions using a small language model. In addition, the trained small language model reliably respects the prescribed output schema and produces semantically appropriate content in each field according to its assigned node role.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Reinforcement learning for LLM agents, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 8 of its 18 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 Aug 2026.

Builds on

8 of 18 references.

Closest ancestors · 1

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2023Reflexion: Language Agents with Verbal Reinforcement Learning20 Mar

Other references · 7

  1. 2022Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Modelscited by 12,459
  2. 2024DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Modelscited by 9,379
  3. 2022ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Modelscited by 8,695
  4. 2024Qwen2.5 Technical Reportcited by 4,942
  5. 2023Not what you've signed up for: Compromising Real-World LLM-Integrated Applications with Indirect Prompt Injectioncited by 1,443
  6. 2024The Instruction Hierarchy: Training LLMs to Prioritize Privileged Instructionscited by 493
  7. 2024AppWorld: A Controllable World of Apps and People for Benchmarking Interactive Coding Agentscited by 401

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026EvoTrainer: Co-Evolving LLM Policies and Training Harnesses for Autonomous Agentic Reinforcement Learning
  2. 2026A Control System, a Dataset, and a Recipe for Making Frozen LLM Agents Learn a Domain
  3. 2025The Landscape of Agentic Reinforcement Learning for LLMs: A Survey
  4. 2026CRRL: A Causality-Based Reinforcement Learning Framework for Autonomous System Recovery
  5. 2026Learning from Viable Failure Prefixes: Milestone Viability Potential Policy Optimization for Long-Horizon LLM Agents
  6. 2026Neglected Free Lunch from Post-training: Progress Advantage for LLM Agents
  7. 2026LLM-ALSO: LLM-Driven Adaptive Learning-Signal Optimization for Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning
  8. 2026Belayer: Efficient Fault Tolerance for LLM Agentic RL Training