mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

World Properties without World Models: Recovering Spatial and Temporal Structure from Co-occurrence Statistics in Static Word Embeddings

arXiv 2603.04317 ↗First posted 4 Mar 2026cs.CL cs.AI cs.LGcited by 0

On the map: World models → World models for language agents

Abstract (arXiv)

A growing literature shows that variables can be linearly decoded from the activations of large language models (LLMs). These range from properties of the world, such as the locations of cities and the lifetimes of historical figures, to emotions and pain. Such findings are often taken as evidence that language models go beyond surface text statistics and form internal models of the world. We show that static word embeddings (fixed, context-insensitive representations learned from corpus statistics) of the same or matched stimuli support much of the same decoding. Across four published cases (place, time, pain and emotion), static vectors predict coordinates and year of death (R^2 = 0.42-0.59), separate pain from matched control sentences (held-out AUC 0.85-0.88), and classify twelve emotions in stories written to avoid naming them (AUC 0.84-0.88). Because static embeddings assign each word a single, context-independent vector, these results are a lower bound on what word associations alone can support. The LLMs retain clear advantages on representational tests, and causal and behavioral findings remain outside the scope of the baseline. On the original authors' entities, where we reproduce their Llama-2 results, the transformer's advantage lies mostly in placing historical figures in the right century and places in the right country, coarse sorting that richer word associations would be expected to improve; within those groups every representation orders items poorly. Static vectors for disambiguated Wikipedia entities, which carry the associations of a particular place or person rather than of the words in its name, close most of the remaining gap, matching Pythia-2.8B on coordinates and Llama-2-7B on year of death. These results indicate that decodability alone cannot distinguish a representation of a property from information already available in fixed distributional associations.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in World models for language agents, one of 11 directions in World models. Builds on 10 of its 16 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 Mar 2026.

Builds on

10 of 16 references.

References · 10

  1. 2013Efficient Estimation of Word Representations in Vector Spacecited by 4,346
  2. 2013Distributed Representations of Words and Phrases and their Compositionalitycited by 3,462
  3. 2016Man is to Computer Programmer as Woman is to Homemaker? Debiasing Word Embeddingscited by 1,304
  4. 2016Semantics derived automatically from language corpora contain human-like biasescited by 894
  5. 2021Probing Classifiers: Promises, Shortcomings, and Advancescited by 831
  6. 2019Designing and Interpreting Probes with Control Taskscited by 608
  7. 2018What you can cram into a single vector: Probing sentence embeddings for linguistic propertiescited by 452
  8. 2023Language Models Represent Space and Timecited by 306
  9. 2021Implicit Representations of Meaning in Neural Language Modelscited by 179
  10. 2021Can Language Models Encode Perceptual Structure Without Grounding? A Case Study in Colorcited by 118

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Linear Spatial World Models Emerge in Large Language Models
  2. 2025Geospatial Mechanistic Interpretability of Large Language Models
  3. 2025CALE : Concept-Aligned Embeddings for Both Within-Lemma and Inter-Lemma Sense Differentiation
  4. 2026Emergent Semantic Representations in World Models through Physical Interaction without Linguistic Supervision
  5. 2025Large Language Models Encode Semantics and Alignment in Linearly Separable Representations
  6. 2026Rethinking Layer Relevance in Large Language Models Beyond Cosine Similarity
  7. 2026Rethinking Contextualization by Reinterpreting Attention Head Channels
  8. 2025On Self-improving Token Embeddings