FeedAIde: Guiding App Users to Submit Rich Feedback Reports by Asking Context-Aware Follow-Up Questions
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
User feedback is essential for the success of mobile apps, yet what users report and what developers need often diverge. Research shows that users often submit vague feedback and omit essential contextual details. This leads to incomplete reports and time-consuming clarification discussions. To overcome this challenge, we propose FeedAIde, a context-aware, interactive feedback approach that supports users during the reporting process by leveraging the reasoning capabilities of Multimodal Large Language Models. FeedAIde captures contextual information, such as the screenshot where the issue emerges, and uses it for adaptive follow-up questions to collaboratively refine with the user a rich feedback report that contains information relevant to developers. We implemented an iOS framework of FeedAIde and evaluated it on a gym's app with its users. Compared to the app's simple feedback form, participants rated FeedAIde as easier and more helpful for reporting feedback. An assessment by two industry experts of the resulting 54 reports showed that FeedAIde improved the quality of both bug reports and feature requests, particularly in terms of completeness. The findings of our study demonstrate the potential of context-aware, GenAI-powered feedback reporting to enhance the experience for users and increase the information value for developers.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 10 of its 60 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 Mar 2026.
Builds on
10 of 60 references.
References · 10
- 2023Lost in the Middle: How Language Models Use Long Contextscited by 3,455
- 2023Unveiling Security, Privacy, and Ethical Concerns of ChatGPTcited by 53
- 2019Assessing the Quality of the Steps to Reproduce in Bug Reportscited by 13
- 2022What should I Ask: A Knowledge-driven Approach for Follow-up Questions Generation in Conversational Surveyscited by 13
- 2019Release early, release often, and watch your users' emotionscited by 6
- 2024On the Automated Processing of User Feedbackcited by 6
- 2024Does GenAI Make Usability Testing Obsolete?cited by 6
- 2025Requirements Elicitation Follow-Up Question Generationcited by 5
- 2019Extracting and Analyzing Context Information in User-Support Conversations on Twittercited by 4
- 2018App Store 2.0: From Crowd Information to Actionable Feedback in Mobile Ecosystemscited by 2
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2024AllHands: Ask Me Anything on Large-scale Verbatim Feedback via Large Language Models
- 2024Say Your Reason: Extract Contextual Rules In Situ for Context-aware Service Recommendation ↗
- 2023What if you said that differently?: How Explanation Formats Affect Human Feedback Efficacy and User Perception
- 2025Beyond Stars: Bridging the Gap Between Ratings and Review Sentiment with LLM
- 2026How Human Feedback Shapes AI-generated Community Notes
- 2024Self-Improving Customer Review Response Generation Based on LLMs
- 2024Constraining Participation: Affordances of Feedback Features in Interfaces to Large Language Models
- 2026From Retrieval to Customer Context: Evaluating Frontier-Model Systems for Voice-of-Customer Analysis