Noise-aware Client Selection for carbon-efficient Federated Learning via Gradient Norm Thresholding
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Training large-scale Neural Networks requires substantial computational power and energy. Federated Learning enables distributed model training across geospatially distributed data centers, leveraging renewable energy sources to reduce the carbon footprint of AI training. Various client selection strategies have been developed to align the volatility of renewable energy with stable and fair model training in a federated system. However, due to the privacy-preserving nature of Federated Learning, the quality of data on client devices remains unknown, posing challenges for effective model training. In this paper, we introduce a modular approach on top to state-of-the-art client selection strategies for carbon-efficient Federated Learning. Our method enhances robustness by incorporating a noisy client data filtering, improving both model performance and sustainability in scenarios with unknown data quality. Additionally, we explore the impact of carbon budgets on model convergence, balancing efficiency and sustainability. Through extensive evaluations, we demonstrate that modern client selection strategies based on local client loss tend to select clients with noisy data, ultimately degrading model performance. To address this, we propose a gradient norm thresholding mechanism using probing rounds for more effective client selection and noise detection, contributing to the practical deployment of carbon-efficient Federated Learning.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 14 of its 30 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 Mar 2026.
Builds on
14 of 30 references.
References · 14
- 2016Communication-Efficient Learning of Deep Networks from Decentralized Datacited by 7,669
- 2019EfficientNet: Rethinking Model Scaling for Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 6,442
- 2019Local Model Poisoning Attacks to Byzantine-Robust Federated Learningcited by 493
- 2022Estimating the Carbon Footprint of BLOOM, a 176B Parameter Language Modelcited by 265
- 2020Client Selection in Federated Learning: Convergence Analysis and Power-of-Choice Selection Strategiescited by 198
- 2020A Principled Approach to Data Valuation for Federated Learningcited by 127
- 2018On the Relation Between the Sharpest Directions of DNN Loss and the SGD Step Lengthcited by 88
- 2017Critical Learning Periods in Deep Neural Networkscited by 79
- 2019Time Matters in Regularizing Deep Networks: Weight Decay and Data Augmentation Affect Early Learning Dynamics, Matter Little Near Convergencecited by 54
- 2023Critical Learning Periods Emerge Even in Deep Linear Networkscited by 13
- 2023FedZero: Leveraging Renewable Excess Energy in Federated Learningcited by 11
- 2021Critical Learning Periods in Federated Learningcited by 8
Built on by
Not cited yet.