Critical Learning Periods in Federated Learning
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Federated learning (FL) is a popular technique to train machine learning (ML) models with decentralized data. Extensive works have studied the performance of the global model; however, it is still unclear how the training process affects the final test accuracy. Exacerbating this problem is the fact that FL executions differ significantly from traditional ML with heterogeneous data characteristics across clients, involving more hyperparameters. In this work, we show that the final test accuracy of FL is dramatically affected by the early phase of the training process, i.e., FL exhibits critical learning periods, in which small gradient errors can have irrecoverable impact on the final test accuracy. To further explain this phenomenon, we generalize the trace of the Fisher Information Matrix (FIM) to FL and define a new notion called FedFIM, a quantity reflecting the local curvature of each clients from the beginning of the training in FL. Our findings suggest that the em initial learning phase plays a critical role in understanding the FL performance. This is in contrast to many existing works which generally do not connect the final accuracy of FL to the early phase training. Finally, seizing critical learning periods in FL is of independent interest and could be useful for other problems such as the choices of hyperparameters such as the number of client selected per round, batch size, and more, so as to improve the performance of FL training and testing.
Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 28 of its 37 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 Sep 2021.
Builds on
28 of 37 references.
References · 28
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
- 2016Communication-Efficient Learning of Deep Networks from Decentralized Datacited by 7,592
- 2019Advances and Open Problems in Federated Learningcited by 3,021
- 2018Federated Optimization in Heterogeneous Networkscited by 2,971
- 2016Federated Learning: Strategies for Improving Communication Efficiencycited by 1,461
- 2019On the Convergence of FedAvg on Non-IID Datacited by 1,220
- 2019Deep Leakage from Gradientscited by 1,004
- 2017Federated Multi-Task Learningcited by 669
- 2020Federated Learning with Matched Averagingcited by 564
- 2018Exploiting Unintended Feature Leakage in Collaborative Learningcited by 509
- 2017Differentially Private Federated Learning: A Client Level Perspectivecited by 451
- 2019Agnostic Federated Learningcited by 451
16 more
- 2014New insights and perspectives on the natural gradient methodcited by 435
- 2018Adaptive Federated Learning in Resource Constrained Edge Computing Systemscited by 408
- 2017Deep Models Under the GAN: Information Leakage from Collaborative Deep Learningcited by 326
- 2017Don't Decay the Learning Rate, Increase the Batch Sizecited by 313
- 2017Three Factors Influencing Minima in SGDcited by 270
- 2018Applied Federated Learning: Improving Google Keyboard Query Suggestionscited by 202
- 2020FetchSGD: Communication-Efficient Federated Learning with Sketchingcited by 178
- 2018Expanding the Reach of Federated Learning by Reducing Client Resource Requirementscited by 162
- 2016Distributed Mean Estimation with Limited Communicationcited by 134
- 2018On the Relation Between the Sharpest Directions of DNN Loss and the SGD Step Lengthcited by 85
- 2018Adaptive Communication Strategies to Achieve the Best Error-Runtime Trade-off in Local-Update SGDcited by 76
- 2020Catastrophic Fisher Explosion: Early Phase Fisher Matrix Impacts Generalizationcited by 61
- 2019Time Matters in Regularizing Deep Networks: Weight Decay and Data Augmentation Affect Early Learning Dynamics, Matter Little Near Convergencecited by 54
- 2020Accordion: Adaptive Gradient Communication via Critical Learning Regime Identificationcited by 19
- 2019Helios: Heterogeneity-Aware Federated Learning with Dynamically Balanced Collaborationcited by 15
- 2021Straggler-Resilient Distributed Machine Learning with Dynamic Backup Workerscited by 3
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 3; 2024: 1; 2025: 2; 2026: 1.
8 papers.
- 2023Revisiting Weighted Aggregation in Federated Learning with Neural Networkscited by 57
- 2022VeriFi: Towards Verifiable Federated Unlearningcited by 41
- 2025Adaptive Unimodal Regulation for Balanced Multimodal Information Acquisitioncited by 18
- 2023Re-Weighted Softmax Cross-Entropy to Control Forgetting in Federated Learningcited by 9
- 2024Weight Scope Alignment: A Frustratingly Easy Method for Model Mergingcited by 2
- 2023EcoLearn: Optimizing the Carbon Footprint of Federated Learningcited by 1
- 2025Warming Up for Zeroth-Order Federated Pre-Training with Low Resource Clientscited by 0
- 2026Noise-aware Client Selection for carbon-efficient Federated Learning via Gradient Norm Thresholdingcited by 0
- 2026Noise-aware Client Selection for carbon-efficient Federated Learning via Gradient Norm Thresholding4 Mar 2026
- 2025Warming Up for Zeroth-Order Federated Pre-Training with Low Resource Clients3 Sep 2025
- 2025Adaptive Unimodal Regulation for Balanced Multimodal Information Acquisition24 Mar 2025
- 2024Weight Scope Alignment: A Frustratingly Easy Method for Model Merging22 Aug 2024
- 2023EcoLearn: Optimizing the Carbon Footprint of Federated Learning27 Oct 2023
- 2023Re-Weighted Softmax Cross-Entropy to Control Forgetting in Federated Learning11 Apr 2023
- 2023Revisiting Weighted Aggregation in Federated Learning with Neural Networks14 Feb 2023
- 2022VeriFi: Towards Verifiable Federated Unlearning25 May 2022