mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Physics-constrained symbolic regression for discovering closed-form equations of multimodal water retention curves from experimental data

arXiv 2603.03346 ↗First posted 24 Feb 2026physics.geo-ph cs.AI cs.SCcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Modeling the unsaturated behavior of porous materials with multimodal pore size distributions presents significant challenges, as standard hydraulic models often fail to capture their complex, multi-scale characteristics. A common workaround involves superposing unimodal retention functions, each tailored to a specific pore size range; however, this approach requires separate parameter identification for each mode, which limits interpretability and generalizability, especially in data-sparse scenarios. In this work, we introduce a fundamentally different approach: a physics-constrained machine learning framework designed for meta-modeling, enabling the automatic discovery of closed-form mathematical expressions for multimodal water retention curves directly from experimental data. Mathematical expressions are represented as binary trees and evolved via genetic programming, while physical constraints are embedded into the loss function to guide the symbolic regressor toward solutions that are physically consistent and mathematically robust. Our results demonstrate that the proposed framework can discover closed-form equations that effectively represent the water retention characteristics of porous materials with varying pore structures. To support third-party validation, application, and extension, we make the full implementation publicly available in an open-source repository.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 12 of its 46 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 Feb 2026.

Builds on

12 of 46 references.

References · 12

  1. 2024KAN: Kolmogorov-Arnold Networkscited by 634
  2. 2019AI Feynman: a Physics-Inspired Method for Symbolic Regressioncited by 536
  3. 2020Neural Additive Models: Interpretable Machine Learning with Neural Netscited by 318
  4. 2019Interpretable machine learning: definitions, methods, and applicationscited by 303
  5. 2019Deep symbolic regression: Recovering mathematical expressions from data via risk-seeking policy gradientscited by 294
  6. 2021Interpretable Deep Learning: Interpretation, Interpretability, Trustworthiness, and Beyondcited by 116
  7. 2022Interpretable Scientific Discovery with Symbolic Regression: A Reviewcited by 105
  8. 2020Trustworthy AIcited by 62
  9. 2020Geometric deep learning for computational mechanics Part I: Anisotropic Hyperelasticitycited by 49
  10. 2023Neural networks meet hyperelasticity: A guide to enforcing physicscited by 45
  11. 2023Discovering interpretable elastoplasticity models via the neural polynomial method enabled symbolic regressionscited by 10
  12. 2025Can ChatGPT implement finite element models for geotechnical engineering applications?cited by 5

Built on by

Not cited yet.