Practical Deep Heteroskedastic Regression
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Uncertainty quantification (UQ) in deep learning regression is of wide interest, as it supports critical applications including sequential decision making and risk-sensitive tasks. In heteroskedastic regression, where the uncertainty of the target depends on the input, a common approach is to train a neural network that parameterizes the mean and the variance of the predictive distribution. Still, training deep heteroskedastic regression models poses practical challenges in the trade-off between uncertainty quantification and mean prediction, such as optimization difficulties, representation collapse, and variance overfitting. In this work we identify previously undiscussed fallacies and propose a simple and efficient procedure that addresses these challenges jointly by post-hoc fitting a variance model across the intermediate layers of a pretrained network on a hold-out dataset. We demonstrate that our method achieves on-par or state-of-the-art uncertainty quantification on several molecular graph datasets, without compromising mean prediction accuracy and remaining cheap to use at prediction time.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 28 of its 49 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Mar 2026.
Builds on
28 of 49 references.
References · 28
- 2017MoleculeNet: A Benchmark for Molecular Machine Learningcited by 1,051
- 2018Reconciling modern machine learning practice and the bias-variance trade-offcited by 927
- 2019Deep Double Descent: Where Bigger Models and More Data Hurtcited by 672
- 2021Equivariant message passing for the prediction of tensorial properties and molecular spectracited by 441
- 2020The Open Catalyst 2020 (OC20) Dataset and Community Challengescited by 246
- 2020Being Bayesian, Even Just a Bit, Fixes Overconfidence in ReLU Networkscited by 231
- 2021Deep Deterministic Uncertainty: A Simple Baselinecited by 200
- 2019Two models of double descent for weak featurescited by 195
- 2022On the Pitfalls of Heteroscedastic Uncertainty Estimation with Probabilistic Neural Networkscited by 120
- 2025UMA: A Family of Universal Models for Atomscited by 105
- 2019Evaluating and Calibrating Uncertainty Prediction in Regression Taskscited by 87
- 2025Learning Smooth and Expressive Interatomic Potentials for Physical Property Predictioncited by 84
16 more
- 2019Reliable training and estimation of variance networkscited by 63
- 2024Open Materials 2024 (OMat24) Inorganic Materials Dataset and Modelscited by 52
- 2023A Study of Bayesian Neural Network Surrogates for Bayesian Optimizationcited by 50
- 2022A Simple Approach to Improve Single-Model Deep Uncertainty via Distance-Awarenesscited by 49
- 2024The Importance of Being Scalable: Improving the Speed and Accuracy of Neural Network Interatomic Potentials Across Chemical Domainscited by 40
- 2022Faithful Heteroscedastic Regression with Neural Networkscited by 37
- 2019Alchemy: A Quantum Chemistry Dataset for Benchmarking AI Modelscited by 36
- 2021Calibrated Uncertainty for Molecular Property Prediction using Ensembles of Message Passing Neural Networkscited by 21
- 2022Posterior Refinement Improves Sample Efficiency in Bayesian Neural Networkscited by 14
- 2018Large-Scale Visual Active Learning with Deep Probabilistic Ensemblescited by 13
- 2024Bayesian Optimization via Continual Variational Last Layer Trainingcited by 13
- 2023Understanding Pathologies of Deep Heteroskedastic Regressioncited by 10
- 2023Uncertainty Quantification for Molecular Property Predictions with Graph Neural Architecture Searchcited by 8
- 2025The Open DAC 2025 Dataset for Sorbent Discovery in Direct Air Capturecited by 7
- 2023Vecchia Gaussian Process Ensembles on Internal Representations of Deep Neural Networkscited by 3
- 2025Probabilistic Skip Connections for Deterministic Uncertainty Quantification in Deep Neural Networkscited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.