GAC: Stabilizing Asynchronous RL Training for LLMs via Gradient Alignment Control
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Asynchronous execution is essential for scaling reinforcement learning (RL) to modern large model workloads, including large language models and AI agents, but it can fundamentally alter RL optimization behavior. While prior work on asynchronous RL focuses on training throughput and distributional correction, we show that naively applying asynchrony to policy-gradient updates can induce qualitatively different training dynamics and lead to severe training instability. Through systematic empirical and theoretical analysis, we identify a key signature of this instability: asynchronous training exhibits persistently high cosine similarity between consecutive policy gradients, in contrast to the near-orthogonal updates observed under synchronized training. This stale-aligned gradient effect amplifies correlated updates and increases the risk of overshooting and divergence. Motivated by this observation, we propose GRADIENT ALIGNMENT CONTROL(GAC), a simple dynamics-aware stabilization method that regulates asynchronous RL progress along stale-aligned directions via gradient projection. We establish convergence guarantees under bounded staleness and demonstrate empirically that GAC recovers stable, on-policy training dynamics and matches synchronized baselines even at high staleness.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 29 of its 37 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Mar 2026.
Builds on
29 of 37 references.
References · 29
- 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,712
- 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 14,441
- 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,192
- 2024DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Modelscited by 8,851
- 2025Qwen3 Technical Reportcited by 8,195
- 2021Measuring Mathematical Problem Solving With the MATH Datasetcited by 5,203
- 2022Training a Helpful and Harmless Assistant with Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedbackcited by 3,634
- 2023Let's Verify Step by Stepcited by 3,598
- 2025DAPO: An Open-Source LLM Reinforcement Learning System at Scalecited by 2,678
- 2015Trust Region Policy Optimizationcited by 2,503
- 2016Asynchronous Methods for Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 2,218
- 2019Fine-Tuning Language Models from Human Preferencescited by 2,124
17 more
- 2022Solving Quantitative Reasoning Problems with Language Modelscited by 1,359
- 2024OlympiadBench: A Challenging Benchmark for Promoting AGI with Olympiad-Level Bilingual Multimodal Scientific Problemscited by 1,099
- 2022Solving math word problems with process- and outcome-based feedbackcited by 871
- 2018IMPALA: Scalable Distributed Deep-RL with Importance Weighted Actor-Learner Architecturescited by 866
- 2025Group Sequence Policy Optimizationcited by 788
- 2025Group-in-Group Policy Optimization for LLM Agent Trainingcited by 442
- 2018Distributed Prioritized Experience Replaycited by 260
- 2025AReaL: A Large-Scale Asynchronous Reinforcement Learning System for Language Reasoningcited by 234
- 2025Light-R1: Curriculum SFT, DPO and RL for Long COT from Scratch and Beyondcited by 175
- 2025A Survey of Reinforcement Learning for Large Reasoning Modelscited by 175
- 2025Reinforcement Learning Optimization for Large-Scale Learning: An Efficient and User-Friendly Scaling Librarycited by 94
- 2025Soft Adaptive Policy Optimizationcited by 89
- 2024Asynchronous RLHF: Faster and More Efficient Off-Policy RL for Language Modelscited by 65
- 2025Prosperity before Collapse: How Far Can Off-Policy RL Reach with Stale Data on LLMs?cited by 49
- 2025BAPO: Stabilizing Off-Policy Reinforcement Learning for LLMs via Balanced Policy Optimization with Adaptive Clippingcited by 47
- 2025AsyncFlow: An Asynchronous Streaming RL Framework for Efficient LLM Post-Trainingcited by 37
- 2025A-3PO: Accelerating Asynchronous LLM Training with Staleness-aware Proximal Policy Approximationcited by 11
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 4.
4 papers.
- 2026Step-TP: A Grounded, Step-Level Dataset with Chain-of-Thought Reasoning for LLM-Guided Tensor Program Optimizationcited by 0
- 2026Staleness-Learning Rate Scaling Laws for Asynchronous RLHFcited by 0
- 2026Cool the Sampler, Not the Learner: Sampling Temperature Moves the Staleness Cliff of Importance-Corrected GRPOcited by 0
- 2026Asynchronous LLM Post-Training: Group-Mass Capping and Convergence Analysiscited by 0
- 2026Asynchronous LLM Post-Training: Group-Mass Capping and Convergence Analysis1 Oct 2026
- 2026Cool the Sampler, Not the Learner: Sampling Temperature Moves the Staleness Cliff of Importance-Corrected GRPO29 Sep 2026
- 2026Staleness-Learning Rate Scaling Laws for Asynchronous RLHF1 Jul 2026
- 2026Step-TP: A Grounded, Step-Level Dataset with Chain-of-Thought Reasoning for LLM-Guided Tensor Program Optimization25 May 2026
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026Stable Asynchrony: Variance-Controlled Off-Policy RL for LLMs
- 2025Periodic Asynchrony: An On-Policy Approach for Accelerating LLM Reinforcement Learning
- 2026Where Does Staleness Accumulate? Pool Aware Effective Staleness Control for Asynchronous RL in LLM Post-Training
- 2026ASymPO: Asymmetric-Scale Policy Optimization for Asynchronous LLM Post-Training Without Behavior Information
- 2026BRACE: Anchored Bellman-Residual Correction for Stale Critics in Asynchronous RL
- 2026COPC: Coupled Off-Policy Correction for Asynchronous LLM Reinforcement Learning
- 2026Single-Rollout Asynchronous Optimization for Agentic Reinforcement Learning
- 2025Stabilizing Reinforcement Learning with LLMs: Formulation and Practices