mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

ASymPO: Asymmetric-Scale Policy Optimization for Asynchronous LLM Post-Training Without Behavior Information

arXiv 2606.03070 ↗First posted 2 Jun 2026cs.LG cs.AIcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Asynchronous reinforcement learning can improve language-model post-training throughput by decoupling response generation from policy optimization, but stale responses introduce distribution drift. Standard behavior-corrected methods control this drift with behavior-policy probabilities, importance ratios, or clipping, which requires token-aligned, versioned, and numerically consistent behavior log-probabilities across rollout and learner systems. We ask whether asynchronous group-relative RL can instead be stabilized using only current-policy probabilities. We identify a scale-imbalance failure mode: when stale responses are evaluated under the current policy, positive and negative loss terms can appear at different negative log-probability scales, so zero-sum advantages no longer imply balanced loss contributions. We propose Asymmetric-Scale Policy Optimization (ASymPO), which normalizes each response's token loss by its current average token negative log-probability. ASymPO requires no behavior-policy probabilities, restores response-level zero-sum balance, and preserves a nonzero learning signal. We also introduce Scaled Policy Optimization (SPO), a fixed negative-scaling baseline, and evaluate both current-policy-only objectives in asynchronous mathematical reasoning post-training.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 26 of its 35 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Jun 2026.

Builds on

26 of 35 references.

References · 26

  1. 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,712
  2. 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 14,441
  3. 2021Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problemscited by 9,743
  4. 2023Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Modelcited by 7,916
  5. 2021Measuring Mathematical Problem Solving With the MATH Datasetcited by 5,203
  6. 2017Deep reinforcement learning from human preferencescited by 3,846
  7. 2023Let's Verify Step by Stepcited by 3,598
  8. 2020Learning to summarize from human feedbackcited by 2,562
  9. 2015Trust Region Policy Optimizationcited by 2,503
  10. 2016Asynchronous Methods for Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 2,218
  11. 2019Fine-Tuning Language Models from Human Preferencescited by 2,124
  12. 2024HybridFlow: A Flexible and Efficient RLHF Frameworkcited by 1,980
14 more
  1. 2022Solving Quantitative Reasoning Problems with Language Modelscited by 1,359
  2. 2022Solving math word problems with process- and outcome-based feedbackcited by 871
  3. 2018IMPALA: Scalable Distributed Deep-RL with Importance Weighted Actor-Learner Architecturescited by 866
  4. 2024ORPO: Monolithic Preference Optimization without Reference Modelcited by 556
  5. 2026GLM-5: from Vibe Coding to Agentic Engineeringcited by 502
  6. 2016Safe and Efficient Off-Policy Reinforcement Learningcited by 260
  7. 2018Distributed Prioritized Experience Replaycited by 260
  8. 2023Secrets of RLHF in Large Language Models Part I: PPOcited by 226
  9. 2016Sample Efficient Actor-Critic with Experience Replaycited by 185
  10. 2025GPG: A Simple and Strong Reinforcement Learning Baseline for Model Reasoningcited by 147
  11. 2025Stabilizing MoE Reinforcement Learning by Aligning Training and Inference Routerscited by 67
  12. 2024Asynchronous RLHF: Faster and More Efficient Off-Policy RL for Language Modelscited by 65
  13. 2025Every Step Evolves: Scaling Reinforcement Learning for Trillion-Scale Thinking Modelcited by 50
  14. 2026RIFT: Repurposing Negative Samples via Reward-Informed Fine-Tuningcited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.

2 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Trajectory Balance with Asynchrony: Decoupling Exploration and Learning for Fast, Scalable LLM Post-Training
  2. 2026COPC: Coupled Off-Policy Correction for Asynchronous LLM Reinforcement Learning
  3. 2026Single-Rollout Asynchronous Optimization for Agentic Reinforcement Learning
  4. 2026Asynchronous LLM Post-Training: Group-Mass Capping and Convergence Analysis
  5. 2026Stable Asynchrony: Variance-Controlled Off-Policy RL for LLMs
  6. 2025Periodic Asynchrony: An On-Policy Approach for Accelerating LLM Reinforcement Learning
  7. 2026GAC: Stabilizing Asynchronous RL Training for LLMs via Gradient Alignment Control
  8. 2026Where Does Staleness Accumulate? Pool Aware Effective Staleness Control for Asynchronous RL in LLM Post-Training