mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Navigating Time's Possibilities: Plausible Counterfactual Explanations for Multivariate Time-Series Forecast through Genetic Algorithms

arXiv 2603.00855 ↗First posted 1 Mar 2026cs.LGcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Counterfactual learning has become promising for understanding and modeling causality in complex and dynamic systems. This paper presents a novel method for counterfactual learning in the context of multivariate time series analysis and forecast. The primary objective is to uncover hidden causal relationships and identify potential interventions to achieve desired outcomes. The proposed methodology integrates genetic algorithms and rigorous causality tests to infer and validate counterfactual dependencies within temporal sequences. More specifically, we employ Granger causality to enhance the reliability of identified causal relationships, rigorously assessing their statistical significance. Then, genetic algorithms, in conjunction with quantile regression, are used to exploit these intricate causal relationships to project future scenarios. The synergy between genetic algorithms and causality tests ensures a thorough exploration of the temporal dynamics present in the data, revealing hidden dependencies and enabling the projection of outcomes under hypothetical interventions. We evaluate the performance of our algorithm on real-world data, showcasing its ability to handle complex causal relationships, revealing meaningful counterfactual insights, and allowing for the prediction of outcomes under hypothetical interventions.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 8 of its 30 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Mar 2026.

Builds on

8 of 30 references.

References · 8

  1. 2017Counterfactual Explanations without Opening the Black Box: Automated Decisions and the GDPRcited by 1,086
  2. 2019Explaining Machine Learning Classifiers through Diverse Counterfactual Explanationscited by 612
  3. 2018All Models are Wrong, but Many are Useful: Learning a Variable's Importance by Studying an Entire Class of Prediction Models Simultaneouslycited by 364
  4. 2019The What-If Tool: Interactive Probing of Machine Learning Modelscited by 207
  5. 2019Towards a Rigorous Evaluation of XAI Methods on Time Seriescited by 67
  6. 2020Counterfactual Explanations for Machine Learning on Multivariate Time Series Datacited by 49
  7. 2020Generating Plausible Counterfactual Explanations for Deep Transformers in Financial Text Classificationcited by 40
  8. 2021GeCo: Quality Counterfactual Explanations in Real Timecited by 32

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.