FastBUS: A Fast Bayesian Framework for Unified Weakly-Supervised Learning
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Machine Learning often involves various imprecise labels, leading to diverse weakly supervised settings. While recent methods aim for universal handling, they usually suffer from complex manual pre-work, ignore the relationships between associated labels, or are unable to batch process due to computational design flaws, resulting in long running times. To address these limitations, we propose a novel general framework that efficiently infers latent true label distributions across various weak supervisions. Our key idea is to express the label brute-force search process as a probabilistic transition of label variables, compressing diverse weakly supervised DFS tree structures into a shared Bayesian network. From this, we derived a latent probability calculation algorithm based on generalized belief propagation and proposed two joint acceleration strategies: 1) introducing a low-rank assumption to approximate the transition matrix, reducing time complexity; 2) designing an end-to-end state evolution module to learn batch-scale transition matrices, facilitating multi-category batch processing. In addition, the equivalence of our method with the EM algorithm in most scenarios is further demonstrated. Extensive experiments show that our method achieves SOTA results under most weakly supervised settings, and achieves up to hundreds of times faster acceleration in running time compared to other general methods.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 44 of its 89 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 Feb 2026.
Builds on
44 of 89 references.
References · 44
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
- 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,456
- 2020Scaling Laws for Neural Language Modelscited by 6,411
- 2017Fashion-MNIST: a Novel Image Dataset for Benchmarking Machine Learning Algorithmscited by 4,283
- 2022Training Compute-Optimal Large Language Modelscited by 2,927
- 2016Categorical Reparameterization with Gumbel-Softmaxcited by 2,708
- 2019MixMatch: A Holistic Approach to Semi-Supervised Learningcited by 1,390
- 2017Virtual Adversarial Training: A Regularization Method for Supervised and Semi-Supervised Learningcited by 918
- 2020DivideMix: Learning with Noisy Labels as Semi-supervised Learningcited by 691
- 2016Making Deep Neural Networks Robust to Label Noise: a Loss Correction Approachcited by 663
- 2020Dual-stream Multiple Instance Learning Network for Whole Slide Image Classification with Self-supervised Contrastive Learningcited by 473
- 2020Early-Learning Regularization Prevents Memorization of Noisy Labelscited by 414
32 more
- 2020Combating noisy labels by agreement: A joint training method with co-regularizationcited by 289
- 2021A Survey on Deep Semi-supervised Learningcited by 250
- 2018Learning from positive and unlabeled data: a surveycited by 218
- 2017Positive-Unlabeled Learning with Non-Negative Risk Estimatorcited by 217
- 2024When Scaling Meets LLM Finetuning: The Effect of Data, Model and Finetuning Methodcited by 201
- 2024Advancing LLM Reasoning Generalists with Preference Treescited by 191
- 2019Learning a Deep ConvNet for Multi-label Classification with Partial Labelscited by 124
- 2022Exploiting Unlabeled Data with Vision and Language Models for Object Detectioncited by 97
- 2022Robust Training under Label Noise by Over-parameterizationcited by 93
- 2020Provably Consistent Partial-Label Learningcited by 92
- 2014Spectral Methods meet EM: A Provably Optimal Algorithm for Crowdsourcingcited by 63
- 2019Learning with Multiple Complementary Labelscited by 53
- 2017Learning with Confident Examples: Rank Pruning for Robust Classification with Noisy Labelscited by 52
- 2021Mixture Proportion Estimation and PU Learning: A Modern Approachcited by 52
- 2023Learning to Rank in Generative Retrievalcited by 46
- 2022Dist-PU: Positive-Unlabeled Learning from a Label Distribution Perspectivecited by 37
- 2018Classification from Pairwise Similarity and Unlabeled Datacited by 36
- 2019Learning from Label Proportions with Consistency Regularizationcited by 34
- 2022Learning from Label Proportions by Learning with Label Noisecited by 30
- 2020Learning from Aggregate Observationscited by 29
- 2019Classification from Pairwise Similarities/Dissimilarities and Unlabeled Data via Empirical Risk Minimizationcited by 21
- 2022PiCO+: Contrastive Label Disambiguation for Robust Partial Label Learningcited by 21
- 2020Pointwise Binary Classification with Pairwise Confidence Comparisonscited by 20
- 2021Learning from Similarity-Confidence Datacited by 19
- 2014Can Image-Level Labels Replace Pixel-Level Labels for Image Parsingcited by 15
- 2023Binary Classification with Confidence Differencecited by 13
- 2023Towards Semi-supervised Learning with Non-random Missing Labelscited by 12
- 2023A Unified Approach to Count-Based Weakly-Supervised Learningcited by 9
- 2024A General Framework for Learning from Weak Supervisioncited by 7
- 2023A Universal Unbiased Method for Classification from Aggregate Observationscited by 5
- 2023CHGNN: A Semi-Supervised Contrastive Hypergraph Learning Networkcited by 3
- 2023Data-driven Knowledge Fusion for Deep Multi-instance Learningcited by 3
Built on by
Not cited yet.