TraderBench: How Robust Are AI Agents in Adversarial Capital Markets?
On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Financial trading and forecasting agents
Abstract (arXiv)
Evaluating AI agents in finance faces two key challenges: static benchmarks require costly expert annotation yet miss the dynamic decision-making central to real-world trading, while LLM-based judges introduce uncontrolled variance on domain-specific tasks. We introduce TraderBench, a benchmark that addresses both issues. It combines expert-verified static tasks (knowledge retrieval, analytical reasoning) with adversarial trading simulations scored purely on realized performance-Sharpe ratio, returns, and drawdown-eliminating judge variance entirely. The framework features two novel tracks: crypto trading with four progressive market-manipulation transforms, and options derivatives scoring across P&L accuracy, Greeks, and risk management. Trading scenarios can be refreshed with new market data to prevent benchmark contamination. Evaluating 13 models (8B open-source to frontier) on ~50 tasks, we find: (1) 8 of 13 models score ~33 on crypto with <1-point variation across adversarial conditions, exposing fixed non-adaptive strategies; (2) extended thinking helps retrieval (+26 points) but has zero impact on trading (+0.3 crypto, -0.1 options). These findings reveal that current agents lack genuine market adaptation, underscoring the need for performance-grounded evaluation in finance.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Financial trading and forecasting agents, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 7 of its 12 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 27 Feb 2026.
Builds on
7 of 12 references.
References · 7
- 2023Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arenacited by 8,393
- 2023Identifying the Risks of LM Agents with an LM-Emulated Sandboxcited by 514
- 2024Personal LLM Agents: Insights and Survey about the Capability, Efficiency and Securitycited by 257
- 2024FinBen: A Holistic Financial Benchmark for Large Language Modelscited by 140
- 2025Finance Agent Benchmark: Benchmarking LLMs on Real-world Financial Research Taskscited by 63
- 2025PRBench: Large-Scale Expert Rubrics for Evaluating High-Stakes Professional Reasoningcited by 29
- 2025LiveTradeBench: Seeking Real-World Alpha with Large Language Modelscited by 13
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 4.
4 papers.
- 2026SoK: Security of Autonomous LLM Agents in Agentic Commercecited by 8
- 2026Agentic Trading: When LLM Agents Meet Financial Marketscited by 7
- 2026KellyBench: A Benchmark for Long-Horizon Sequential Decision Makingcited by 3
- 2026The Alpha Illusion: Reported Alpha from LLM Trading Agents Should Not Be Treated as Deployment Evidencecited by 3
- 2026Agentic Trading: When LLM Agents Meet Financial Markets19 May 2026
- 2026The Alpha Illusion: Reported Alpha from LLM Trading Agents Should Not Be Treated as Deployment Evidence16 May 2026
- 2026KellyBench: A Benchmark for Long-Horizon Sequential Decision Making30 Apr 2026
- 2026SoK: Security of Autonomous LLM Agents in Agentic Commerce15 Apr 2026
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025When Agents Trade: Live Multi-Market Trading Benchmark for LLM Agents
- 2025TradeTrap: Are LLM-based Trading Agents Truly Reliable and Faithful?
- 2026SoK: Trading Agents or Market Crashers? Dissecting Robustness and Security Failures in Academic Financial LLM Trading Schemes
- 2025StockBench: Can LLM Agents Trade Stocks Profitably In Real-world Markets?
- 2026PredictionMarketBench: A SWE-bench-Style Framework for Backtesting Trading Agents on Prediction Markets
- 2026Contagion on the Trading Floor: How Adversarial Signals Spread in Multi-Agent Trading Systems
- 2024INVESTORBENCH: A Benchmark for Financial Decision-Making Tasks with LLM-based Agent
- 2025CryptoBench: A Dynamic Benchmark for Expert-Level Evaluation of LLM Agents in Cryptocurrency