mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

SGAgent: Suggestion-Guided LLM-Based Multi-Agent Framework for Repository-Level Software Repair

arXiv 2602.23647 ↗First posted 27 Feb 2026cs.SEcited by 9

On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Software engineering coding agents

Abstract (arXiv)

Large Language Models (LLMs) have enabled intelligent agents that autonomously interact with environments and invoke external tools. Recently, agent-based software repair has drawn wide attention, as repair agents can localize bugs, generate patches, and achieve state-of-the-art performance on repository-level benchmarks (e.g., SWE-Bench). However, existing approaches usually adopt a localize-then-fix paradigm, jumping directly from "where the bug is" to "how to fix it", leaving a fundamental reasoning gap. To this end, we propose SGAgent, a Suggestion-Guided multi-Agent framework for repository-level software repair, which follows a localize-suggest-fix paradigm. SGAgent introduces a suggestion phase to strengthen the transition from localization to repair: the suggester starts from the buggy locations, incrementally retrieves relevant context until it fully understands the bug, and provides actionable repair suggestions. We further construct a Knowledge Graph (KG) from the target repository and develop a KG-based toolkit to strengthen SGAgent's global contextual awareness and repository-level reasoning. Three specialized sub-agents (i.e., localizer, suggester, and fixer) collaborate to achieve automated end-to-end software repair. We evaluate SGAgent on SWE-Bench-Lite. SGAgent with Claude-3.5 achieves 51.3% repair accuracy, 81.2% file-level, and 52.4% function-level localization accuracy at an average cost of 1.48 per instance, outperforming all baselines using the same base model. SGAgent also generalizes well across base LLMs, reaching a 60.7% resolution rate with Claude-4. When extended to vulnerability repair, it achieves 48.0% on VUL4J and VJBench, demonstrating strong generalization across tasks and programming languages.

Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Software engineering coding agents, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 43 of its 61 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 27 Feb 2026.

Builds on

43 of 61 references.

Closest ancestors · 8

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2025DARS: Dynamic Action Re-Sampling to Enhance Coding Agent Performance by Adaptive Tree Traversal18 Mar
  2. 2024SWE-Search: Enhancing Software Agents with Monte Carlo Tree Search and Iterative Refinement26 Oct
  3. 2024OpenHands: An Open Platform for AI Software Developers as Generalist Agents23 Jul
  4. 2024Agentless: Demystifying LLM-based Software Engineering Agents1 Jul
  5. 2024SWE-agent: Agent-Computer Interfaces Enable Automated Software Engineering6 May
  6. 2024RepairAgent: An Autonomous, LLM-Based Agent for Program Repair25 Mar
  7. 2024Executable Code Actions Elicit Better LLM Agents1 Feb
  8. 2024CodeAgent: Enhancing Code Generation with Tool-Integrated Agent Systems for Real-World Repo-level Coding Challenges14 Jan

Other references · 35

  1. 2022ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Modelscited by 8,355
  2. 2025Qwen3 Technical Reportcited by 8,195
  3. 2021Evaluating Large Language Models Trained on Codecited by 8,053
  4. 2021Program Synthesis with Large Language Modelscited by 3,509
  5. 2023SWE-bench: Can Language Models Resolve Real-World GitHub Issues?cited by 3,193
  6. 2023ExpeL: LLM Agents Are Experiential Learnerscited by 814
  7. 2024A Survey on Large Language Models for Code Generationcited by 646
  8. 2025Agent Laboratory: Using LLM Agents as Research Assistantscited by 405
  9. 2023Multi-Agent Collaboration: Harnessing the Power of Intelligent LLM Agentscited by 329
  10. 2024AutoCodeRover: Autonomous Program Improvementcited by 272
  11. 2017Zero-Shot Learning -- The Good, the Bad and the Uglycited by 254
  12. 2025SWE-RL: Advancing LLM Reasoning via Reinforcement Learning on Open Software Evolutioncited by 246
23 more
  1. 2022A Comprehensive Survey of Few-shot Learning: Evolution, Applications, Challenges, and Opportunitiescited by 162
  2. 2020A Review of Generalized Zero-Shot Learning Methodscited by 159
  3. 2024RepoGraph: Enhancing AI Software Engineering with Repository-level Code Graphcited by 88
  4. 2021CURE: Code-Aware Neural Machine Translation for Automatic Program Repaircited by 85
  5. 2023A Survey of Large Language Models for Code: Evolution, Benchmarking, and Future Trendscited by 66
  6. 2024CodexGraph: Bridging Large Language Models and Code Repositories via Code Graph Databasescited by 62
  7. 2023A Survey on Large Language Models for Software Engineeringcited by 58
  8. 2023A Survey of Learning-based Automated Program Repaircited by 55
  9. 2023How Effective Are Neural Networks for Fixing Security Vulnerabilitiescited by 50
  10. 2023RepairLLaMA: Efficient Representations and Fine-Tuned Adapters for Program Repaircited by 50
  11. 2023ChatGPT for Vulnerability Detection, Classification, and Repair: How Far Are We?cited by 44
  12. 2024GraphCoder: Enhancing Repository-Level Code Completion via Code Context Graph-based Retrieval and Language Modelcited by 40
  13. 2025EXPEREPAIR: Dual-Memory Enhanced LLM-based Repository-Level Program Repaircited by 34
  14. 2025Enhancing repository-level software repair via repository-aware knowledge graphscited by 26
  15. 2023GAMMA: Revisiting Template-based Automated Program Repair via Mask Predictioncited by 22
  16. 2024A Case Study of LLM for Automated Vulnerability Repair: Assessing Impact of Reasoning and Patch Validation Feedbackcited by 22
  17. 2021DeepDebug: Fixing Python Bugs Using Stack Traces, Backtranslation, and Code Skeletonscited by 17
  18. 2022CIRCLE: Continual Repair across Programming Languagescited by 17
  19. 2024A Large-scale Empirical Study on Fine-tuning Large Language Models for Unit Testingcited by 15
  20. 2018How to Design a Program Repair Bot? Insights from the Repairnator Projectcited by 10
  21. 2024Can GPT-O1 Kill All Bugs? An Evaluation of GPT-Family LLMs on QuixBugscited by 7
  22. 2025Knowledge-Enhanced Program Repair for Data Science Codecited by 6
  23. 2025Repair-R1: Better Test Before Repaircited by 6

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 9.

9 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026PhoenixRepair: Rethinking Repair Strategy Exploration in Software Agents
  2. 2026MultiFixer: A Coordinator-Proposer Based Multi-Agent Framework For Fixing Multi-Hunk Bugs
  3. 2025REFINE: Enhancing Program Repair Agents through Context-Aware Patch Refinement
  4. 2024An Empirical Study on LLM-based Agents for Automated Bug Fixing
  5. 2025Understanding Automated Program Repair Agents Through the Lens of Traceability: An Empirical Study
  6. 2026XAgent: eXecution-guided Agentic AI for Effective Localization and Resolution of GitHub Issues
  7. 2026SelfHeal: Empirical Fix Pattern Analysis and Bug Repair in LLM Agents
  8. 2026Kozuchi Agent: A Language-Agnostic Open-Weight Agent for Software Repair