mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Know What You Know: Metacognitive Entropy Calibration for Verifiable RL Reasoning

arXiv 2602.22751 ↗First posted 26 Feb 2026cs.AIcited by 3

On the map: LLM reasoning → Reinforcement learning for reasoning

Abstract (arXiv)

Large reasoning models (LRMs) have emerged as a powerful paradigm for solving complex real-world tasks. In practice, these models are predominantly trained via Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards (RLVR), yet most existing outcome-only RLVR pipelines rely almost exclusively on a binary correctness signal and largely ignore the model's intrinsic uncertainty. We term this discrepancy the uncertainty-reward mismatch, under which high- and low-uncertainty solutions are treated equivalently, preventing the policy from "Know What You Know" and impeding the shift from optimizing for correct answers to optimizing effective reasoning paths. This limitation is especially critical in reasoning-centric tasks such as mathematics and question answering, where performance hinges on the quality of the model's internal reasoning process rather than mere memorization of final answers. To address this, we propose EGPO, a metacognitive entropy calibration framework that explicitly integrates intrinsic uncertainty into RLVR for enhancing LRMs. EGPO estimates per-sample uncertainty using a zero-overhead entropy proxy derived from token-level likelihoods and aligns it with extrinsic correctness through an asymmetric calibration mechanism that preserves correct reasoning while selectively regulating overconfident failures, thereby enabling stable and uncertainty-aware policy optimization. Moreover, EGPO recovers informative learning signals from otherwise degenerate group-based rollouts without modifying the verifier or reward definition. Extensive experiments across multiple benchmarks demonstrate that the proposed EGPO leads to substantial and consistent improvements in reasoning performance, establishing a principled path for advancing LRMs through metacognitive entropy calibration.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Reinforcement learning for reasoning, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 41 of its 54 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 Feb 2026.

Builds on

41 of 54 references.

Closest ancestors · 17

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2025Beyond Correctness: Confidence-Aware Reward Modeling for Enhancing Large Language Model Reasoning9 Nov
  2. 2025Explore Data Left Behind in Reinforcement Learning for Reasoning Language Models6 Nov
  3. 2025Do Not Step Into the Same River Twice: Learning to Reason from Trial and Error30 Oct
  4. 2025PACR: Progressively Ascending Confidence Reward for LLM Reasoning25 Oct
  5. 2025Confidence as a Reward: Transforming LLMs into Reward Models15 Oct
  6. 2025EDGE-GRPO: Entropy-Driven GRPO with Guided Error Correction for Advantage Diversity29 Jul
  7. 2025The Surprising Effectiveness of Negative Reinforcement in LLM Reasoning2 Jun
  8. 2025The Entropy Mechanism of Reinforcement Learning for Reasoning Language Models28 May
  9. 2025KTAE: A Model-Free Algorithm to Key-Tokens Advantage Estimation in Mathematical Reasoning22 May
  10. 2025The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Entropy Minimization in LLM Reasoning21 May
  11. 2025DRA-GRPO: Your GRPO Needs to Know Diverse Reasoning Paths for Mathematical Reasoning14 May
  12. 2025Understanding R1-Zero-Like Training: A Critical Perspective26 Mar
5 more
  1. 2025DAPO: An Open-Source LLM Reinforcement Learning System at Scale18 Mar
  2. 2025AURORA:Automated Training Framework of Universal Process Reward Models via Ensemble Prompting and Reverse Verification17 Feb
  3. 2025DeepSeek-R1: Incentivizing Reasoning Capability in LLMs via Reinforcement Learning22 Jan
  4. 2023Let's Verify Step by Step31 May
  5. 2023Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Model29 May

Other references · 24

  1. 2022Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Modelscited by 12,302
  2. 2021Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problemscited by 9,743
  3. 2024DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Modelscited by 8,851
  4. 2022ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Modelscited by 8,355
  5. 2020Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understandingcited by 7,768
  6. 2022Self-Consistency Improves Chain of Thought Reasoning in Language Modelscited by 5,601
  7. 2021Measuring Mathematical Problem Solving With the MATH Datasetcited by 5,203
  8. 2017On Calibration of Modern Neural Networkscited by 4,860
  9. 2018Soft Actor-Critic: Off-Policy Maximum Entropy Deep Reinforcement Learning with a Stochastic Actorcited by 4,635
  10. 2022Large Language Models are Zero-Shot Reasonerscited by 4,323
  11. 2017Deep reinforcement learning from human preferencescited by 3,846
  12. 2023Tree of Thoughts: Deliberate Problem Solving with Large Language Modelscited by 3,155
12 more
  1. 2020Learning to summarize from human feedbackcited by 2,562
  2. 2015Trust Region Policy Optimizationcited by 2,503
  3. 2019Fine-Tuning Language Models from Human Preferencescited by 2,124
  4. 2024HybridFlow: A Flexible and Efficient RLHF Frameworkcited by 1,980
  5. 2015High-Dimensional Continuous Control Using Generalized Advantage Estimationcited by 1,916
  6. 2022Solving Quantitative Reasoning Problems with Language Modelscited by 1,359
  7. 2019Can You Trust Your Model's Uncertainty? Evaluating Predictive Uncertainty Under Dataset Shiftcited by 1,274
  8. 2024OpenAI o1 System Cardcited by 1,220
  9. 2025Group Sequence Policy Optimizationcited by 788
  10. 2025ReSearch: Learning to Reason with Search for LLMs via Reinforcement Learningcited by 152
  11. 2025OpenRubrics: Towards Scalable Synthetic Rubric Generation for Reward Modeling and LLM Alignmentcited by 118
  12. 2025Agentic Reasoning: A Streamlined Framework for Enhancing LLM Reasoning with Agentic Toolscited by 106

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 3.

3 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026ERR+: Sequential Entropy Resolution for Efficient and Decisive LLM Reasoning
  2. 2025Revisiting Entropy in Reinforcement Learning for Large Reasoning Models
  3. 2026PAEC: Position-Aware Entropy Calibration for LLM Reasoning in RLVR
  4. 2025Beyond the 80/20 Rule: High-Entropy Minority Tokens Drive Effective Reinforcement Learning for LLM Reasoning
  5. 2025RLPR: Extrapolating RLVR to General Domains without Verifiers
  6. 2025From Accuracy to Robustness: A Study of Rule- and Model-based Verifiers in Mathematical Reasoning
  7. 2025The Reasoning Boundary Paradox: How Reinforcement Learning Constrains Language Models
  8. 2025Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards Implicitly Incentivizes Correct Reasoning in Base LLMs