mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Requesting Expert Reasoning: Augmenting LLM Agents with Learned Collaborative Intervention

arXiv 2602.22546 ↗First posted 26 Feb 2026cs.AIcited by 3

On the map: LLM reasoning → Reasoning for agents, planning and code

also in 1 more
Abstract (arXiv)

Large Language Model (LLM) based agents excel at general reasoning but often fail in specialized domains where success hinges on long-tail knowledge absent from their training data. While human experts can provide this missing knowledge, their guidance is often unstructured and unreliable, making its direct integration into an agent's plan problematic. To address this, we introduce AHCE (Active Human-Augmented Challenge Engagement), a framework for on-demand Human-AI collaboration. At its core, the Human Feedback Module (HFM) employs a learned policy to treat the human expert as an interactive reasoning tool. Extensive experiments in Minecraft demonstrate the framework's effectiveness, increasing task success rates by 32% on normal difficulty tasks and nearly 70% on highly difficult tasks, all with minimal human intervention. Our work demonstrates that successfully augmenting agents requires learning how to request expert reasoning, moving beyond simple requests for help.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Reasoning for agents, planning and code, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 16 of its 29 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 Feb 2026.

Builds on

16 of 29 references.

References · 16

  1. 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,132
  2. 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 14,441
  3. 2024DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Modelscited by 8,851
  4. 2025DeepSeek-R1: Incentivizing Reasoning Capability in LLMs via Reinforcement Learningcited by 6,146
  5. 2024Qwen2.5 Technical Reportcited by 4,713
  6. 2023Qwen Technical Reportcited by 3,273
  7. 2023Voyager: An Open-Ended Embodied Agent with Large Language Modelscited by 2,081
  8. 2025Search-R1: Training LLMs to Reason and Leverage Search Engines with Reinforcement Learningcited by 1,371
  9. 2023Mastering Diverse Domains through World Modelscited by 1,193
  10. 2023Gemini: A Family of Highly Capable Multimodal Modelscited by 810
  11. 2023Describe, Explain, Plan and Select: Interactive Planning with Large Language Models Enables Open-World Multi-Task Agentscited by 396
  12. 2025R1-Searcher: Incentivizing the Search Capability in LLMs via Reinforcement Learningcited by 322
4 more
  1. 2023Ghost in the Minecraft: Generally Capable Agents for Open-World Environments via Large Language Models with Text-based Knowledge and Memorycited by 288
  2. 2019MineRL: A Large-Scale Dataset of Minecraft Demonstrationscited by 210
  3. 2025ReSearch: Learning to Reason with Search for LLMs via Reinforcement Learningcited by 152
  4. 2024MineDreamer: Learning to Follow Instructions via Chain-of-Imagination for Simulated-World Controlcited by 52

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 3.

3 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2024Proactive Agent: Shifting LLM Agents from Reactive Responses to Active Assistance
  2. 2025Collaborating Action by Action: A Multi-agent LLM Framework for Embodied Reasoning
  3. 2025Theory of Mind in Action: The Instruction Inference Task in Dynamic Human-Agent Collaboration
  4. 2024LookALike: Human Mimicry based collaborative decision making
  5. 2026Collaborative Agent Reasoning Engineering (CARE): A Three-Party Design Methodology for Systematically Engineering AI Agents with Subject Matter Experts, Developers, and Helper Agents
  6. 2025VeriLA: A Human-Centered Evaluation Framework for Interpretable Verification of LLM Agent Failures
  7. 2025A Call for Collaborative Intelligence: Why Human-Agent Systems Should Precede AI Autonomy
  8. 2025Training Proactive and Personalized LLM Agents