mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Collaborative Agent Reasoning Engineering (CARE): A Three-Party Design Methodology for Systematically Engineering AI Agents with Subject Matter Experts, Developers, and Helper Agents

arXiv 2604.28043 ↗First posted 30 Apr 2026cs.AIcited by 1

On the map: LLM reasoning → Reasoning for agents, planning and code

also in 1 more
Abstract (arXiv)

We present Collaborative Agent Reasoning Engineering (CARE), a disciplined methodology for engineering Large Language Model (LLM) agents in scientific domains. Unlike ad-hoc trial-and-error approaches, CARE specifies behavior, grounding, tool orchestration, and verification through reusable artifacts and systematic, stage-gated phases. The methodology employs a three-party workflow involving Subject-Matter Experts (SMEs), developers, and LLM-based helper agents. These helper agents function as facilitation infrastructure, transforming informal domain intent into structured, reviewable specifications for human approval at defined gates. CARE addresses the "jagged technological frontier", characterized by uneven LLM performance, by bridging the gap between novice and expert analysts regarding domain constraints and verification practices. By generating concrete artifacts, including interaction requirements, reasoning policies, and evaluation criteria, CARE ensures agent behavior is specifiable, testable, and maintainable. Evaluation results from a scientific use case demonstrate that this stage-gated, artifact-driven methodology yields measurable improvements in development efficiency and complex-query performance.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Reasoning for agents, planning and code, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 5 of its 7 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 Apr 2026.

Builds on

5 of 7 references.

References · 5

  1. 2023A Prompt Pattern Catalog to Enhance Prompt Engineering with ChatGPTcited by 612
  2. 2025The AI Scientist-v2: Workshop-Level Automated Scientific Discovery via Agentic Tree Searchcited by 375
  3. 2025Towards Scientific Intelligence: A Survey of LLM-based Scientific Agentscited by 96
  4. 2024SciAgents: Automating scientific discovery through multi-agent intelligent graph reasoningcited by 90
  5. 2025The AI Cosmologist I: An Agentic System for Automated Data Analysiscited by 9

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Agent Gym: A Framework for Continuous Evaluation and Evolution of LLM Agents Through Human-in-the-Loop Feedback
  2. 2025AgentFrontier: Expanding the Capability Frontier of LLM Agents with ZPD-Guided Data Synthesis
  3. 2026AI Agent Systems: Architectures, Applications, and Evaluation
  4. 2026AgentFactory: Towards Automated Agentic System Design and Optimization
  5. 2026Architecting Agentic Communities using Design Patterns
  6. 2024AgentQuest: A Modular Benchmark Framework to Measure Progress and Improve LLM Agents
  7. 2025VeriLA: A Human-Centered Evaluation Framework for Interpretable Verification of LLM Agent Failures
  8. 2025Unifying Language Agent Algorithms with Graph-based Orchestration Engine for Reproducible Agent Research