Don't stop me now: How Validation Criteria Affect Checkpoint Selection and Early Stopping
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Checkpoint selection is a standard component of neural network training, yet the validation criterion used to select a checkpoint is often chosen heuristically. Moreover, the same criterion may be used either only to rank checkpoints after completion of a predefined training run or also to determine when training should stop, thereby affecting both the selected checkpoint and the set of checkpoints available for selection. In this work, we systematically investigate the role of validation criteria under these two settings. We separately vary the training loss, the validation criterion, and the target evaluation metric, and compare post-hoc checkpoint selection, in which training proceeds for all predefined epochs, with patience-based early stopping, in which the validation criterion also controls training termination. We consider three Cross-Entropy, C-Loss, and PolyLoss as training losses, and accuracy, macro-F1, and Matthews correlation coefficient as target metrics. Selection quality is assessed through the relative gap between the test performance of the validation-selected checkpoint and the best-observed test performance for the same target metric over the complete predefined training run.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 56 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 Feb 2026.
Builds on
19 of 56 references.
References · 19
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
- 2017High-dimensional dynamics of generalization error in neural networkscited by 238
- 2014Qualitatively characterizing neural network optimization problemscited by 186
- 2022PolyLoss: A Polynomial Expansion Perspective of Classification Loss Functionscited by 62
- 2023Loss Functions and Metrics in Deep Learningcited by 42
- 2021Early-stopped neural networks are consistentcited by 34
- 2019Addressing the Loss-Metric Mismatch with Adaptive Loss Alignmentcited by 33
- 2016No bad local minima: Data independent training error guarantees for multilayer neural networkscited by 29
- 2018How deep is deep enough? -- Quantifying class separability in the hidden layers of deep neural networkscited by 28
- 2017Early stopping for kernel boosting algorithms: A general analysis with localized complexitiescited by 27
- 2016Local minima in training of neural networkscited by 19
- 2022On The Effects Of Data Normalisation For Domain Adaptation On EEG Datacited by 13
7 more
- 2025Rethinking Early Stopping: Refine, Then Calibratecited by 13
- 2021Score-oriented loss (SOL) functionscited by 11
- 2024Don't Push the Button! Exploring Data Leakage Risks in Machine Learning and Transfer Learningcited by 11
- 2018A Surprising Linear Relationship Predicts Test Performance in Deep Networkscited by 4
- 2023A comprehensive theoretical framework for the optimization of neural networks classification performance with respect to weighted metricscited by 3
- 2021Pre-interpolation loss behaviour in neural networkscited by 2
- 2021PACMAN: PAC-style bounds accounting for the Mismatch between Accuracy and Negative log-losscited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.