Pre-interpolation loss behaviour in neural networks
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
When training neural networks as classifiers, it is common to observe an increase in average test loss while still maintaining or improving the overall classification accuracy on the same dataset. In spite of the ubiquity of this phenomenon, it has not been well studied and is often dismissively attributed to an increase in borderline correct classifications. We present an empirical investigation that shows how this phenomenon is actually a result of the differential manner by which test samples are processed. In essence: test loss does not increase overall, but only for a small minority of samples. Large representational capacities allow losses to decrease for the vast majority of test samples at the cost of extreme increases for others. This effect seems to be mainly caused by increased parameter values relating to the correctly processed sample features. Our findings contribute to the practical understanding of a common behaviour of deep neural networks. We also discuss the implications of this work for network optimisation and generalisation.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 13 of its 22 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 Mar 2021.
Builds on
13 of 22 references.
References · 13
- 2015Batch Normalization: Accelerating Deep Network Training by Reducing Internal Covariate Shiftcited by 6,979
- 2017Fashion-MNIST: a Novel Image Dataset for Benchmarking Machine Learning Algorithmscited by 4,283
- 2018Reconciling modern machine learning practice and the bias-variance trade-offcited by 919
- 2019Deep Double Descent: Where Bigger Models and More Data Hurtcited by 667
- 2015Train faster, generalize better: Stability of stochastic gradient descentcited by 547
- 2014In Search of the Real Inductive Bias: On the Role of Implicit Regularization in Deep Learningcited by 339
- 2017Train longer, generalize better: closing the generalization gap in large batch training of neural networkscited by 278
- 2018Implicit Self-Regularization in Deep Neural Networks: Evidence from Random Matrix Theory and Implications for Learningcited by 211
- 2018Sensitivity and Generalization in Neural Networks: an Empirical Studycited by 187
- 2014Qualitatively characterizing neural network optimization problemscited by 186
- 2016Robust Large Margin Deep Neural Networkscited by 117
- 2020Optimal Regularization Can Mitigate Double Descentcited by 107
1 more
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 0; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.
2 papers.