What Drives Students' Use of AI Chatbots? Technology Acceptance in Conversational AI
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Conversational AI tools have been rapidly adopted by students and are becoming part of their learning routines. To understand what drives this adoption, we draw on the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) and examine how perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use relate to students' behavioral intention to use conversational AI that generates responses for learning tasks. We extend TAM by incorporating trust, perceived enjoyment, and subjective norms as additional factors that capture social and affective influences and uncertainty around AI outputs. Using partial least squares structural equation modeling, we find perceived usefulness remains the strongest predictor of students' intention to use conversational AI. However, perceived ease of use does not exert a significant direct effect on behavioral intention once other factors are considered, operating instead indirectly through perceived usefulness. Trust and subjective norms significantly influence perceptions of usefulness, while perceived enjoyment exerts both a direct and indirect effect on usage intentions. These findings suggest that adoption decisions for conversational AI systems are influenced less by effort-related considerations and more by confidence in system outputs, affective engagement, and social context. Future research is needed to further examine how these acceptance relationships generalize across different conversational systems and usage contexts.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 12 of its 69 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 Feb 2026.
Builds on
12 of 69 references.
References · 12
- 2022Automatic Generation of Programming Exercises and Code Explanations using Large Language Modelscited by 124
- 2023"It's Weird That it Knows What I Want": Usability and Interactions with Copilot for Novice Programmerscited by 62
- 2023Students' Voices on Generative AI: Perceptions, Benefits, and Challenges in Higher Educationcited by 41
- 2022Worldwide AI Ethics: a review of 200 guidelines and recommendations for AI governancecited by 28
- 2024Open Source Language Models Can Provide Feedback: Evaluating LLMs' Ability to Help Students Using GPT-4-As-A-Judgecited by 19
- 2024ELLMA-T: an Embodied LLM-agent for Supporting English Language Learning in Social VRcited by 8
- 2024Learning-by-teaching with ChatGPT: The effect of teachable ChatGPT agent on programming educationcited by 8
- 2025Student Perspectives on the Benefits and Risks of AI in Educationcited by 6
- 2025A Survey of LLM-Based Applications in Programming Education: Balancing Automation and Human Oversightcited by 6
- 2025Understanding Human-AI Trust in Educationcited by 4
- 2023Exploring the Potential of Large Language Models in Generating Code-Tracing Questions for Introductory Programming Coursescited by 3
- 2025Understanding the Practices, Perceptions, and (Dis)Trust of Generative AI among Instructors: A Mixed-methods Study in the U.S. Higher Educationcited by 3
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.
2 papers.