mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Train on Validation (ToV): Fast data selection with applications to fine-tuning

arXiv 2510.00386 ↗First posted 1 Oct 2025cs.LG cs.AI stat.MLcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

State-of-the-art machine learning often follows a two-stage process: (i)~pre-training on large, general-purpose datasets; (ii)~fine-tuning on task-specific data. In fine-tuning, selecting training examples that closely reflect the target distribution is crucial. However, it is often the case that only a few samples are available from the target distribution. Existing data selection methods treat these target samples as a validation set and estimate the effect of adding or removing a single sample from the training pool by performing inference on the validation set. We propose a simpler and faster alternative that inverts the usual role of train and validation: we perform inference on the training pool before and after fine-tuning on the validation set. We then select samples whose predictions change the most. Our key insight is that the training samples most affected by fine-tuning on a small validation set tend to be the most beneficial for reducing test loss on the target distribution. Experiments on instruction tuning and named entity recognition tasks show that, in most cases, our method achieves lower test log-loss than state-of-the-art approaches. We support our findings with theoretical analysis.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 25 of its 32 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Oct 2025.

Builds on

25 of 32 references.

References · 25

  1. 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,971
  2. 2019Unsupervised Cross-lingual Representation Learning at Scalecited by 3,935
  3. 2022Scaling Instruction-Finetuned Language Modelscited by 3,024
  4. 2020Don't Stop Pretraining: Adapt Language Models to Domains and Taskscited by 1,565
  5. 2023The Flan Collection: Designing Data and Methods for Effective Instruction Tuningcited by 739
  6. 2023Instruction Tuning with GPT-4cited by 686
  7. 2020Estimating Training Data Influence by Tracing Gradient Descentcited by 580
  8. 2024LESS: Selecting Influential Data for Targeted Instruction Tuningcited by 532
  9. 2023How Far Can Camels Go? Exploring the State of Instruction Tuning on Open Resourcescited by 408
  10. 2023Data Selection for Language Models via Importance Resamplingcited by 329
  11. 2023TRAK: Attributing Model Behavior at Scalecited by 283
  12. 2023Data Filtering Networkscited by 250
13 more
  1. 2021Deep learning: a statistical viewpointcited by 240
  2. 2022Datamodels: Predicting Predictions from Training Datacited by 189
  3. 2024DsDm: Model-Aware Dataset Selection with Datamodelscited by 105
  4. 2024How to Train Data-Efficient LLMscited by 93
  5. 2024Training Data Attribution via Approximate Unrolled Differentiationcited by 34
  6. 2019Less Is Better: Unweighted Data Subsampling via Influence Functioncited by 30
  7. 2017Optimal Subsampling for Large Sample Logistic Regressioncited by 29
  8. 2023Theoretical and Practical Perspectives on what Influence Functions Docited by 29
  9. 2024TSDS: Data Selection for Task-Specific Model Finetuningcited by 28
  10. 2023Towards a statistical theory of data selection under weak supervisioncited by 27
  11. 2025Optimizing ML Training with Metagradient Descentcited by 23
  12. 2024Data-Efficient Learning via Clustering-Based Sensitivity Sampling: Foundation Models and Beyondcited by 15
  13. 2018Optimal Subsampling Algorithms for Big Data Regressionscited by 11

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 3.

3 papers.