mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Enhancing Automatic Chord Recognition via Pseudo-Labeling and Knowledge Distillation

arXiv 2602.19778 ↗First posted 23 Feb 2026cs.SD cs.IR cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Automatic Chord Recognition (ACR) is constrained by the scarcity of aligned chord annotations, which are costly to acquire. At the same time, open-weight pre-trained models are more accessible than their proprietary training data. In this work, we present a two-stage training pipeline that leverages pre-trained models together with unlabeled audio. The proposed method decouples training into two stages. In the first stage, we use the pre-trained BTC model as a teacher to generate pseudo-labels for over 1,000 hours of diverse unlabeled audio and train a student model solely on these pseudo-labels. In the second stage, the student is continually trained on ground-truth labels as they become available. To prevent catastrophic forgetting of the representations learned in the first stage, we apply selective knowledge distillation (KD) from the teacher as a regularizer. In our experiments, two models (BTC, 2E1D) were used as students. In Stage 1, using only pseudo-labels, the BTC student achieves about 99% of the teacher's performance, while the 2E1D model achieves about 97% of the teacher's performance across seven standard mir_eval metrics. After continual training with labeled data in Stage 2, the resulting BTC student model consistently surpasses both the traditional supervised learning baseline and the original pre-trained teacher model across all metrics. The resulting 2E1D student model also outperforms the supervised baseline and approaches teacher-level performance, with both models demonstrating substantial gains on rare chord qualities.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 37 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 23 Feb 2026.

Builds on

17 of 37 references.

References · 17

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
  2. 2015Distilling the Knowledge in a Neural Networkcited by 10,076
  3. 2016Learning without Forgettingcited by 2,465
  4. 2020FixMatch: Simplifying Semi-Supervised Learning with Consistency and Confidencecited by 2,080
  5. 2019Self-training with Noisy Student improves ImageNet classificationcited by 1,304
  6. 2019Three scenarios for continual learningcited by 610
  7. 2018Enabling Factorized Piano Music Modeling and Generation with the MAESTRO Datasetcited by 215
  8. 2016FMA: A Dataset For Music Analysiscited by 205
  9. 2021Rethinking Soft Labels for Knowledge Distillation: A Bias-Variance Tradeoff Perspectivecited by 116
  10. 2025A Comprehensive Survey on Knowledge Distillationcited by 49
  11. 2019DALI: a large Dataset of synchronized Audio, LyrIcs and notes, automatically created using teacher-student machine learning paradigmcited by 19
  12. 2019A Bi-directional Transformer for Musical Chord Recognitioncited by 19
5 more
  1. 2023Learning From Biased Soft Labelscited by 8
  2. 2022Continuous Soft Pseudo-Labeling in ASRcited by 6
  3. 2023Scaling Up Music Information Retrieval Training with Semi-Supervised Learningcited by 2
  4. 2020Improving the Classification of Rare Chords with Unlabeled Datacited by 1
  5. 2021A Note on Knowledge Distillation Loss Function for Object Classificationcited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.