RAmmStein: Regime Adaptation in Mean-reverting Markets with Stein Thresholds -- Optimal Impulse Control in Concentrated AMMs
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Concentrated liquidity provision in decentralized exchanges presents a fundamental Impulse Control problem. Liquidity Providers (LPs) face a non-trivial trade-off between maximizing fee accrual through tight price-range concentration and minimizing the friction costs of rebalancing, including gas fees and swap slippage. Existing methods typically employ heuristic or threshold strategies that fail to account for market dynamics. This paper formulates liquidity management as an optimal control problem and derives the corresponding Hamilton-Jacobi-Bellman quasi-variational inequality (HJB-QVI). We present an approximate solution RAmmStein, a Deep Reinforcement Learning method that incorporates the mean-reversion speed (theta) of an Ornstein-Uhlenbeck process among other features as input to the model. We demonstrate that the agent learns to separate the state space into regions of action and inaction. We further extend the framework with RAmmStein-Width, which jointly optimizes rebalancing timing and position width via a 6-action DDQN. We evaluate the framework using high-frequency 1Hz Coinbase trade data comprising over 6.8M trades on a realistic environment (10M TVL, 1% default width). Experimental results show that RAmmStein achieves a net ROI of 1.60%, the highest among all realistic (non-omniscient) strategies, while greedy strategies lose up to -8.4% to gas costs. Notably, the agent reduces rebalancing frequency by 85% compared to greedy rebalancing. RAmmStein-Width discovers extreme parsimony on its own, executing only 9 rebalances and 40 in gas, and degrades more slowly than all active strategies at elevated gas costs. Our results demonstrate that regime-aware laziness can significantly improve capital efficiency by preserving the returns that would otherwise be eroded by the operational costs.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 13 of its 37 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 23 Feb 2026.
Builds on
13 of 37 references.
References · 13
- 2015Deep Reinforcement Learning with Double Q-learningcited by 1,745
- 2015End-to-End Training of Deep Visuomotor Policiescited by 875
- 2017A Deep Reinforcement Learning Framework for the Financial Portfolio Management Problemcited by 128
- 2018Market Making via Reinforcement Learningcited by 47
- 2018Double Deep Q-Learning for Optimal Executioncited by 43
- 2021Strategic Liquidity Provision in Uniswap v3cited by 11
- 2022Automated Market Making and Loss-Versus-Rebalancingcited by 10
- 2023Adaptive Liquidity Provision in Uniswap V3 with Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 6
- 2023Uniswap Liquidity Provision: An Online Learning Approachcited by 5
- 2023A Myersonian Framework for Optimal Liquidity Provision in Automated Market Makerscited by 4
- 2022An Empirical Study of Market Inefficiencies in Uniswap and SushiSwapcited by 2
- 2025Improving DeFi Accessibility through Efficient Liquidity Provisioning with Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 2
1 more
- 2022Efficient Rollup Batch Posting Strategy on Base Layercited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026Concentrated Liquidity Provision: a Reinforcement Learning Perspective
- 2026SAiFE-gym: Model-based Environments for Automated Market Making with Concentrated Liquidity
- 2026Reinforcement Learning for Dividend Optimization in Partially Observed Regime-Switching Diffusion Model
- 2025FR-LUX: Friction-Aware, Regime-Conditioned Policy Optimization for Implementable Portfolio Management
- 2024Deep Reinforcement Learning for Online Optimal Execution Strategies
- 2025Deep reinforcement learning for optimal trading with partial information
- 2026Deep Reinforcement Learning Framework for Diversified Portfolio Management Across Global Equity Markets
- 2024Solving The Dynamic Volatility Fitting Problem: A Deep Reinforcement Learning Approach