A Myersonian Framework for Optimal Liquidity Provision in Automated Market Makers
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
In decentralized finance ("DeFi"), automated market makers (AMMs) enable traders to programmatically exchange one asset for another. Such trades are enabled by the assets deposited by liquidity providers (LPs). The goal of this paper is to characterize and interpret the optimal (i.e., profit-maximizing) strategy of a monopolist liquidity provider, as a function of that LP's beliefs about asset prices and trader behavior. We introduce a general framework for reasoning about AMMs based on a Bayesian-like belief inference framework, where LPs maintain an asset price estimate. In this model, the market maker (i.e., LP) chooses a demand curve that specifies the quantity of a risky asset to be held at each dollar price. Traders arrive sequentially and submit a price bid that can be interpreted as their estimate of the risky asset price; the AMM responds to this submitted bid with an allocation of the risky asset to the trader, a payment that the trader must pay, and a revised internal estimate for the true asset price. We define an incentive-compatible (IC) AMM as one in which a trader's optimal strategy is to submit its true estimate of the asset price, and characterize the IC AMMs as those with downward-sloping demand curves and payments defined by a formula familiar from Myerson's optimal auction theory. We generalize Myerson's virtual values, and characterize the profit-maximizing IC AMM. The optimal demand curve generally has a jump that can be interpreted as a "bid-ask spread," which we show is caused by a combination of adverse selection risk (dominant when the degree of information asymmetry is large) and monopoly pricing (dominant when asymmetry is small). This work opens up new research directions into the study of automated exchange mechanisms from the lens of optimal auction theory and iterative belief inference, using tools of theoretical computer science in a novel way.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 1 Mar 2023.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 2; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.
4 papers.
- 2024GemNet: Menu-Based, Strategy-Proof Multi-Bidder Auctions Through Deep Learningcited by 14
- 2024Optimal Automated Market Makers: Differentiable Economics and Strong Dualitycited by 1
- 2023ZeroSwap: Data-driven Optimal Market Making in DeFicited by 0
- 2026RAmmStein: Regime Adaptation in Mean-reverting Markets with Stein Thresholds -- Optimal Impulse Control in Concentrated AMMscited by 0
- 2026RAmmStein: Regime Adaptation in Mean-reverting Markets with Stein Thresholds -- Optimal Impulse Control in Concentrated AMMs23 Feb 2026
- 2024GemNet: Menu-Based, Strategy-Proof Multi-Bidder Auctions Through Deep Learning11 Jun 2024
- 2024Optimal Automated Market Makers: Differentiable Economics and Strong Duality14 Feb 2024
- 2023ZeroSwap: Data-driven Optimal Market Making in DeFi13 Oct 2023