Sequential Membership Inference Attacks
On the map: LLM safety and security → Membership inference attacks
Abstract (arXiv)
Modern AI models are not static. They go through multiple updates in their lifecycles. We propose to design Sequential Membership Inference (SeMI) attacks leading to tighter privacy audits by exploiting the sequence of models and injecting a target canary at a controlled insertion time. First, for empirical mean computation, we develop SeMI*, an {optimal SeMI attack to identify the presence of a target inserted at a specific insertion step}. We derive the power of SeMI* to show that accessing the model sequence yields more powerful MI attacks than scrutinising only the final model. SeMI* exhibits an isolation property -- its power depends on the statistics obtained right before and after insertion of the target. Leveraging this insight, we develop practical white-box (accessing model gradients) and black-box (accessing loss) SeMI attacks against models trained with (DP-)SGD. Across datasets and models trained with (DP-)SGD, our experiments show that SeMI attacks achieve higher powers than snapshot-independent baselines, and yield tighter privacy audits thanks to (a) control over the insertion time and (b) observations across the model sequence.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Membership inference attacks, one of 12 directions in LLM safety and security. Builds on 20 of its 37 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 18 Feb 2026.
Builds on
20 of 37 references.
Closest ancestors · 4
Same direction, newest first
- 2024Some Targets Are Harder to Identify than Others: Quantifying the Target-dependent Membership Leakage15 Feb
- 2023Gaussian Membership Inference Privacy12 Jun
- 2021Membership Inference Attacks From First Principles7 Dec
- 2021Enhanced Membership Inference Attacks against Machine Learning Models18 Nov
Other references · 16
- 2014Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognitioncited by 15,267
- 2017Fashion-MNIST: a Novel Image Dataset for Benchmarking Machine Learning Algorithmscited by 4,283
- 2016Deep Learning with Differential Privacycited by 2,682
- 2016Membership Inference Attacks against Machine Learning Modelscited by 2,221
- 2013The Composition Theorem for Differential Privacycited by 290
- 2019White-box vs Black-box: Bayes Optimal Strategies for Membership Inferencecited by 265
- 2020Auditing Differentially Private Machine Learning: How Private is Private SGD?cited by 213
- 2021Adversary Instantiation: Lower Bounds for Differentially Private Machine Learningcited by 193
- 2020When Machine Unlearning Jeopardizes Privacycited by 181
- 2022The Privacy Onion Effect: Memorization is Relativecited by 128
- 2023Privacy Auditing with One (1) Training Runcited by 119
- 2019Updates-Leak: Data Set Inference and Reconstruction Attacks in Online Learningcited by 117
4 more
- 2019Analyzing Information Leakage of Updates to Natural Language Modelscited by 89
- 2022Debugging Differential Privacy: A Case Study for Privacy Auditingcited by 39
- 2022CANIFE: Crafting Canaries for Empirical Privacy Measurement in Federated Learningcited by 24
- 2024Auditing Differential Privacy Guarantees Using Density Estimationcited by 6
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.