Auditing Differential Privacy Guarantees Using Density Estimation
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We present a novel method for accurately auditing the differential privacy (DP) guarantees of DP mechanisms. In particular, our solution is applicable to auditing DP guarantees of machine learning (ML) models. Previous auditing methods tightly capture the privacy guarantees of DP-SGD trained models in the white-box setting where the auditor has access to all intermediate models; however, the success of these methods depends on a priori information about the parametric form of the noise and the subsampling ratio used for sampling the gradients. We present a method that does not require such information and is agnostic to the randomization used for the underlying mechanism. Similarly to several previous DP auditing methods, we assume that the auditor has access to a set of independent observations from two one-dimensional distributions corresponding to outputs from two neighbouring datasets. Furthermore, our solution is based on a simple histogram-based density estimation technique to find lower bounds for the statistical distance between these distributions when measured using the hockey-stick divergence. We show that our approach also naturally generalizes the previously considered class of threshold membership inference auditing methods. We improve upon accurate auditing methods such as the f-DP auditing. Moreover, we address an open problem on how to accurately audit the subsampled Gaussian mechanism without any knowledge of the parameters of the underlying mechanism.
Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 24 of its 44 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Jun 2024.
Builds on
24 of 44 references.
References · 24
- 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
- 2016Deep Learning with Differential Privacycited by 2,682
- 2018The Secret Sharer: Evaluating and Testing Unintended Memorization in Neural Networkscited by 847
- 2021Membership Inference Attacks From First Principlescited by 839
- 2021Opacus: User-Friendly Differential Privacy Library in PyTorchcited by 375
- 2013The Composition Theorem for Differential Privacycited by 290
- 2018Privacy Amplification by Subsampling: Tight Analyses via Couplings and Divergencescited by 237
- 2018Improving the Gaussian Mechanism for Differential Privacy: Analytical Calibration and Optimal Denoisingcited by 216
- 2020Auditing Differentially Private Machine Learning: How Private is Private SGD?cited by 213
- 2021Adversary Instantiation: Lower Bounds for Differentially Private Machine Learningcited by 193
- 2021Numerical Composition of Differential Privacycited by 174
- 2023Privacy Auditing with One (1) Training Runcited by 119
12 more
- 2021Optimal Accounting of Differential Privacy via Characteristic Functioncited by 83
- 2022Connect the Dots: Tighter Discrete Approximations of Privacy Loss Distributionscited by 50
- 2020Tight Differential Privacy for Discrete-Valued Mechanisms and for the Subsampled Gaussian Mechanism Using FFTcited by 43
- 2022Debugging Differential Privacy: A Case Study for Privacy Auditingcited by 39
- 2023One-shot Empirical Privacy Estimation for Federated Learningcited by 35
- 2022Bayesian Estimation of Differential Privacycited by 31
- 2022CANIFE: Crafting Canaries for Empirical Privacy Measurement in Federated Learningcited by 24
- 2023Unleashing the Power of Randomization in Auditing Differentially Private MLcited by 19
- 2024Nearly Tight Black-Box Auditing of Differentially Private Machine Learningcited by 19
- 2021Local Differential Privacy Is Equivalent to Contraction of Eγ-Divergencecited by 17
- 2018Property Testing for Differential Privacycited by 16
- 2023A Note On Interpreting Canary Exposurecited by 6
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 4; 2026: 2.
6 papers.
- 2025Optimizing Canaries for Privacy Auditing with Metagradient Descentcited by 6
- 2025The Hitchhiker's Guide to Efficient, End-to-End, and Tight DP Auditingcited by 4
- 2026Sequential Membership Inference Attackscited by 1
- 2025Sublinear Algorithms for Wasserstein and Total Variation Distances: Applications to Fairness and Privacy Auditingcited by 0
- 2025Auditing Differential Privacy in the Black-Box Settingcited by 0
- 2026Advancing the State-of-the-Art in Empirical Privacy Auditingcited by 0
- 2026Advancing the State-of-the-Art in Empirical Privacy Auditing9 Jun 2026
- 2026Sequential Membership Inference Attacks18 Feb 2026
- 2025Optimizing Canaries for Privacy Auditing with Metagradient Descent21 Jul 2025
- 2025The Hitchhiker's Guide to Efficient, End-to-End, and Tight DP Auditing20 Jun 2025
- 2025Auditing Differential Privacy in the Black-Box Setting15 Mar 2025
- 2025Sublinear Algorithms for Wasserstein and Total Variation Distances: Applications to Fairness and Privacy Auditing10 Mar 2025