mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Dialects of Translationese Shape Language Model Learning

arXiv 2602.16469 ↗First posted 18 Feb 2026cs.CLcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Machine-translated data is widely used in multilingual NLP, particularly where native text is scarce. However, translated text differs systematically from native text. This phenomenon is known as translationese, and it reflects both traces of the source language and characteristic properties of translation itself. In this paper, we study how training on machine-translated data affects small English language models, focusing on how translationese from different source languages shapes linguistic acceptability judgments and language modeling for different domains. We train models on English text translated from 24 typologically and resource-diverse source languages, enabling a systematic analysis of how source language and corpus properties influence what models learn. Our results show that the source language has a clear impact on model behavior: general perplexity is more driven by the lexical diversity of the translated corpus, but grammatical performance is strongly correlated to typological similarity to English if trained on enough data. Even translation quality is a strong predictor of language modeling performance.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 15 of its 47 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 18 Feb 2026.

Builds on

15 of 47 references.

References · 15

  1. 2024The FineWeb Datasets: Decanting the Web for the Finest Text Data at Scalecited by 1,104
  2. 2019Choosing Transfer Languages for Cross-Lingual Learningcited by 143
  3. 2021Machine Translationese: Effects of Algorithmic Bias on Linguistic Complexity in Machine Translationcited by 70
  4. 2023Monolingual or Multilingual Instruction Tuning: Which Makes a Better Alpacacited by 60
  5. 2024A Shocking Amount of the Web is Machine Translated: Insights from Multi-Way Parallelismcited by 33
  6. 2022A Balanced Data Approach for Evaluating Cross-Lingual Transfer: Mapping the Linguistic Blood Bankcited by 29
  7. 2025BOUQuET: dataset, Benchmark and Open initiative for Universal Quality Evaluation in Translationcited by 21
  8. 2025Multilingual Language Model Pretraining using Machine-translated Datacited by 17
  9. 2025Confounding Factors in Relating Model Performance to Morphologycited by 14
  10. 2024To Diverge or Not to Diverge: A Morphosyntactic Perspective on Machine Translation vs Human Translationcited by 10
  11. 2025Analyzing the Effect of Linguistic Similarity on Cross-Lingual Transfer: Tasks and Experimental Setups Mattercited by 10
  12. 2025Untangling the Influence of Typology, Data and Model Architecture on Ranking Transfer Languages for Cross-Lingual POS Taggingcited by 9
3 more
  1. 2024Simpson's Paradox and the Accuracy-Fluency Tradeoff in Translationcited by 8
  2. 2016On the Similarities Between Native, Non-native and Translated Textscited by 5
  3. 2026Preferences for Idiomatic Language are Acquired Slowly -- and Forgotten Quickly: A Case Study on Swedishcited by 3

Built on by

Not cited yet.