MultiCW: A Large-Scale Balanced Benchmark Dataset for Training Robust Check-Worthiness Detection Models
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Large Language Models (LLMs) are beginning to reshape how media professionals verify information, yet automated support for detecting check-worthy claims a key step in the fact-checking process remains limited. We introduce the Multi-Check-Worthy (MultiCW) dataset, a balanced multilingual benchmark for check-worthy claim detection spanning 16 languages, 7 topical domains, and 2 writing styles. It consists of 123,722 samples, evenly distributed between noisy (informal) and structured (formal) texts, with balanced representation of check-worthy and non-check-worthy classes across all languages. To probe robustness, we also introduce an equally balanced out-of-distribution evaluation set of 27,761 samples in 4 additional languages. To provide baselines, we benchmark 3 common fine-tuned multilingual transformers against a diverse set of 15 commercial and open LLMs under zero-shot settings. Our findings show that fine-tuned models consistently outperform zero-shot LLMs on claim classification and show strong out-of-distribution generalization across languages, domains, and styles. MultiCW provides a rigorous multilingual resource for advancing automated fact-checking and enables systematic comparisons between fine-tuned models and cutting-edge LLMs on the check-worthy claim detection task.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 16 of its 36 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 18 Feb 2026.
Builds on
16 of 36 references.
References · 16
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
- 2019Unsupervised Cross-lingual Representation Learning at Scalecited by 3,907
- 2020DeBERTa: Decoding-enhanced BERT with Disentangled Attentioncited by 2,157
- 2020Fighting the COVID-19 Infodemic: Modeling the Perspective of Journalists, Fact-Checkers, Social Media Platforms, Policy Makers, and the Societycited by 72
- 2021DialFact: A Benchmark for Fact-Checking in Dialoguecited by 62
- 2020Overview of CheckThat! 2020: Automatic Identification and Verification of Claims in Social Mediacited by 46
- 2018Overview of the CLEF-2018 CheckThat! Lab on Automatic Identification and Verification of Political Claims. Task 1: Check-Worthinesscited by 41
- 2024Claim Detection for Automated Fact-checking: A Survey on Monolingual, Multilingual and Cross-Lingual Researchcited by 35
- 2023Multilingual Previously Fact-Checked Claim Retrievalcited by 32
- 2024AFaCTA: Assisting the Annotation of Factual Claim Detection with Reliable LLM Annotatorscited by 28
- 2021LESA: Linguistic Encapsulation and Semantic Amalgamation Based Generalised Claim Detection from Online Contentcited by 22
- 2022Empowering the Fact-checkers! Automatic Identification of Claim Spans on Twittercited by 19
4 more
- 2021Overview of the CLEF-2019 CheckThat!: Automatic Identification and Verification of Claimscited by 18
- 2024Comparing Specialised Small and General Large Language Models on Text Classification: 100 Labelled Samples to Achieve Break-Even Performancecited by 17
- 2022Autonomation, Not Automation: Activities and Needs of European Fact-checkers as a Basis for Designing Human-Centered AI Systemscited by 7
- 2024Multilingual Models for Check-Worthy Social Media Posts Detectioncited by 2
Built on by
Not cited yet.