mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Retrieval Collapses When AI Pollutes the Web

arXiv 2602.16136 ↗First posted 18 Feb 2026cs.IR cs.AIcited by 4

On the map: Retrieval-augmented generation → Privacy and security of RAG

Abstract (arXiv)

The rapid proliferation of AI-generated content on the Web presents a structural risk to information retrieval, as search engines and Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) systems increasingly consume evidence produced by the Large Language Models (LLMs). We characterize this ecosystem-level failure mode as Retrieval Collapse, a two-stage process where (1) AI-generated content dominates search results, eroding source diversity, and (2) low-quality or adversarial content infiltrates the retrieval pipeline. We analyzed this dynamic through controlled experiments involving both high-quality SEO-style content and adversarially crafted content. In the SEO scenario, a 67% pool contamination led to over 80% exposure contamination, creating a homogenized yet deceptively healthy state where answer accuracy remains stable despite the reliance on synthetic sources. Conversely, under adversarial contamination, baselines like BM25 exposed ~19% of harmful content, whereas LLM-based rankers demonstrated stronger suppression capabilities. These findings highlight the risk of retrieval pipelines quietly shifting toward synthetic evidence and the need for retrieval-aware strategies to prevent a self-reinforcing cycle of quality decline in Web-grounded systems.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Privacy and security of RAG, one of 15 directions in Retrieval-augmented generation. Builds on 15 of its 20 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 18 Feb 2026.

Builds on

15 of 20 references.

Closest ancestors · 1

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2024Corpus Poisoning via Approximate Greedy Gradient Descent7 Jun

Other references · 14

  1. 2018Datasheets for Datasetscited by 1,371
  2. 2020Leveraging Passage Retrieval with Generative Models for Open Domain Question Answeringcited by 1,203
  3. 2021Documenting Large Webtext Corpora: A Case Study on the Colossal Clean Crawled Corpuscited by 481
  4. 2021Multimodal datasets: misogyny, pornography, and malignant stereotypescited by 326
  5. 2023Self-Consuming Generative Models Go MADcited by 239
  6. 2016Unbiased Learning-to-Rank with Biased Feedbackcited by 155
  7. 2023MAGE: Machine-generated Text Detection in the Wildcited by 130
  8. 2024Bias and Unfairness in Information Retrieval Systems: New Challenges in the LLM Eracited by 97
  9. 2024SafeBench: A Safety Evaluation Framework for Multimodal Large Language Modelscited by 63
  10. 2023Neural Retrievers are Biased Towards LLM-Generated Contentcited by 37
  11. 2023Invisible Relevance Bias: Text-Image Retrieval Models Prefer AI-Generated Imagescited by 13
  12. 2025Delving into: the quantification of Ai-generated content on the internet (synthetic data)cited by 8
2 more
  1. 2024Spiral of Silence: How is Large Language Model Killing Information Retrieval? -- A Case Study on Open Domain Question Answeringcited by 5
  2. 2024Exploring the Escalation of Source Bias in User, Data, and Recommender System Feedback Loopcited by 5

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 4.

4 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Safety Degradation in AI Agents
  2. 2026Relevance as a Vulnerability: How Web Retrieval Degrades Safety Alignment in LLM Agents
  3. 2026The Synthetic Web: Adversarially-Curated Mini-Internets for Diagnosing Epistemic Weaknesses of Language Agents
  4. 2025Information Retrieval in the Age of Generative AI: The RGB Model
  5. 2024Evaluating Robustness of Generative Search Engine on Adversarial Factual Questions
  6. 2026Beyond Semantic Relevance: Counterfactual Risk Minimization for Robust Retrieval-Augmented Generation
  7. 2024Learning by Surprise: Adaptive Mitigation of Model Collapse in Large Language Models
  8. 2026When Poison Fails After Retrieval: Revisiting Corpus Poisoning under Chunking and Reranking Pipelines